[..]
> Dates are 2022-06-08 as expected and not 1970-01-03 as described
> at tests.rb.o.
[..]
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/vinnie.html
I briefly looked at vinnie. Given it is arch:all, I kinda expect it
to produce the "same" deb regardless of the arch it is buil
ar -t
(Assuming you have linux-image-6.10.6-armmp installed.)
As noted in my earlier reply, might only happen on ext4.
Good luck,
Chris
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 05:32:53PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> debug messages with newly added debug messages:
>
> dracut-install: Handle module &
Hi,
while investigating a test failure in ksh93u+m, it became clear that
packages last built before the time_t-64bit transition can have
latent bugs.
They might very well now FTBFS or fail at runtime (autopkgtest time
or later).
I believe FTBFS are bugs are probably caught by periodic rebuilds
do
Hi,
> On 2024-08-01 07:55:15 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Should Debian drop armel from the upcoming Debian release?
>
> Was there a conclusion to the discussion on d-arm@l.d.o? What is the
> opinion of the two porters that we currently have listed for armel
> (added to CC)?
fakeroot, a notable
Control: reopen -1
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 10:36:40PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> I've done some light tests on arm64 and emulated armhf, but
> additional tests would be very helpful.
Seems like that wasn't enough and on the buildds the build-time
tests fail:
PASS:
debian-arm,
please help testing fakeroot/experimental, which fixes the FTBFS on
armel, armhf. Please test it.
I've done some light tests on arm64 and emulated armhf, but
additional tests would be very helpful.
> Changes:
> fakeroot (1.35.1-1.2) experimental; urgency=medium
> .
>* Non-maint
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 src:binutils
Control: found -2 binutils/2.42.50.20240618-1
I'm cloning this to src:binutils as the problem is likely either
there or in gcc; as Johannes stated below, the newer gcc requires
the new binutils. If it's gcc, please reassign there.
CC-ed debia
Control: tags -1 + pending
* Simon McVittie [240317 15:57]:
> Package: libruby
> Version: 1:3.1
[..]
> Now that libruby3.1t64 has reached unstable, libruby is uninstallable on
> the architectures affected by the 64-bit time_t transition,
[..]
> I suspect the only change needed here is to updat
Dear ARM Porters,
util-linux has an autopkgtest checking if its binaries contain any
large chunks of just zeroes. This check has recently began failing
on arm64, armel, armhf. I found that /bin/dmesg now has a 56kB size
region of just zeroes on arm64. Judging by the sizes of other
binaries, this s
9 matches
Mail list logo
