Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf

2024-08-25 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 06:46:35AM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: > > I'll note that fakeroot was probably broken on armel, armhf since > > the t64 migration until mid-August. > > Is fakeroot involved in any way? If so, it might make sense to > > discard any results from that period. > Thanks for

Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf

2024-08-25 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello Chris, Am 26.08.24 um 00:05 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler: [..] Dates are 2022-06-08 as expected and not 1970-01-03 as described at tests.rb.o. [..] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/vinnie.html I briefly looked at vinnie. Given it is arch:all, I kinda expect

Re: Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf

2024-08-25 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
[..] > Dates are 2022-06-08 as expected and not 1970-01-03 as described > at tests.rb.o. [..] > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/vinnie.html I briefly looked at vinnie. Given it is arch:all, I kinda expect it to produce the "same" deb regardless of the arch it is buil

Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf

2024-08-25 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello Vagrant, in the meantime I did a build at amdahl.debian.org and can't reproduce the problem too. i did it with this package https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/csvjdbc.html Dates are 2022-06-08 as expected and not 1970-01-03 as described at tests.rb.o.