Hi,
while investigating a test failure in ksh93u+m, it became clear that
packages last built before the time_t-64bit transition can have
latent bugs.
They might very well now FTBFS or fail at runtime (autopkgtest time
or later).
I believe FTBFS are bugs are probably caught by periodic rebuilds
do
Hi,
On 15-08-2024 20:35, Martin wrote:
What would be the best way, esp. for people outside of Debian, to always
know about such problems? And not only read about it, when it's already
solved?
Ideally bug affecting specific architectures should have the right
usertags. I believe in this case t
On 2024-08-13 20:53, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> fakeroot, a notable key part of the infrastructure required to build
> packages, FTBFS on armel and armhf since March, due to t64 changes
> on these architectures.
>
> I think this is indicative of the developer interest in armel and
> armhf and the
On 07/31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
=== iWMMXt ===
I'm not aware of any remaining users for iWMMXt, and we dropped
support for ARMv7 PJ4 CPUs (MMP2, Berlin) already, so the
only supported hardware that even has this is Intel/Marvell
PXA and MMP1.
pixman had [1][2] iwMMXt paths that I optimized for
4 matches
Mail list logo
