On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 16:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-08-06 at 16:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Most of issues with armel packages are about libatomic link
>> time requirements, and about applications that hardcode armv7
>> or vfp instruction extensions.
>
> Code that h
On Tue, 2024-08-06 at 16:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I believe the builds are all done on arm64 hardware, and the table
> lists the same issue for available hardware on armel, armhf and arm64.
>
> There are a few instructions that armel binaries can use that
> are missing on armv8 hardware (c
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 13:54, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-08-06 at 13:03 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>> > It's certainly not easy to determine the actual usage statistics, but as
>> > long as there
>> > is a considerable user base, I think dropping support for hardware because
Hi Hector,
On Tue, 2024-08-06 at 13:03 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > It's certainly not easy to determine the actual usage statistics, but as
> > long as there
> > is a considerable user base, I think dropping support for hardware because
> > it's old
> > doesn't sound right to me.
>
> The main
Hello Adrian,
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 09:39, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> > Should Debian drop armel from the upcoming Debian release?
>
> While I understand the reasoning behind it, also having read Arnd's mail, I
> don't
> understand why these decisions rarely consider the environment and
5 matches
Mail list logo
