Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Wookey, >OK, got those. but that's just binaries. It was the source changes I >was looking for (or did I misunderstand and you didn't actually make >any of those?), Yes, I did not make any source changes. These were the last binaries from before the t64 transition (I downloaded the .deb files

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-27 Thread Wookey
On 2024-03-27 15:27 +, Wookey wrote: > On 2024-03-26 22:28 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > > I hacked that, and I tried to do armel and armhf as well but > > dak stopped me, whereas mini-dak was not as strict. > > What was the actual problem with uploading the images you built? Just > not h

Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf

2024-03-27 Thread Wookey
On 2024-03-26 22:28 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > I hacked that, and I tried to do armel and armhf as well but > dak stopped me, whereas mini-dak was not as strict. What was the actual problem with uploading the images you built? Just not having any corresponding source? Or something more compl