Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 09:46, Martin wrote: > > Quoting Bastian Blank : > > But why? What is provided by an armel userland that armhf can't? > > My employer runs Debian on this armv5(?) hardware: > > https://www.taskit.de/produkte/embedded-produkte/computer-on-module/132/stamp9g20-512f/128r > > S

Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)

Quoting Bastian Blank : But why? What is provided by an armel userland that armhf can't? My employer runs Debian on this armv5(?) hardware: https://www.taskit.de/produkte/embedded-produkte/computer-on-module/132/stamp9g20-512f/128r Sure, the kernel is not the Debian one, but something around

Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?)

[dropped some recipients, this mail is not about d-i and the problem at hand] Hi On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 08:34:27AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The most important ARMv5 platform is now probably at91, as > Microchip still releases new sam9 chips[1] and is going to > keep supporting it for a whil