On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 8:03 AM Lennart Sorensen
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 09:51:23PM -0400, Alan Corey wrote:
> > I know I can but it will be twice as slow, which is why I want armhf.
> > Under 64 bit both the data and pointers will be twice as big. With
> > unlimited memory that would b
Well, somewhere I got this and I like it, I'd like to have more. On a Pi 3b:
Architecture:armv7l
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 4
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 09:51:23PM -0400, Alan Corey wrote:
> I know I can but it will be twice as slow, which is why I want armhf.
> Under 64 bit both the data and pointers will be twice as big. With
> unlimited memory that would be OK but a Pi CPU can only access 1 GB.
> I've tried 64 bit.
It's
On Monday, 3 April 2023 03:51:23 CEST Alan Corey wrote:
> I know I can but it will be twice as slow, which is why I want armhf.
> Under 64 bit both the data and pointers will be twice as big. With
> unlimited memory that would be OK but a Pi CPU can only access 1 GB.
> I've tried 64 bit.
For the
4 matches
Mail list logo
