Re: neon: armhf baseline for next release ?

2023-02-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2023-02-10 at 10:23 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > For an individual package that wants to make use of neon, the correct > thing to do is to make the neon support detected at run-time rather than > rely on it at build-time and enabling or disabling codepaths, features, > etc. as appropr

Re: About ARM

2023-02-10 Thread 肖盛文
Hi Paolo, Debian iso support BIOS and EFI  in amd64 arch. I didn't know whether if has any arm64 arch CPU support BIOS. BTW: Please reply to maillist. 在 2023/2/9 12:08, p db 写道: Dear Mr. Xiao Sheng Wen, Thank you very much for your reply, but about the Phytium cpu, i don't know nothing, and

Re: Support for Orange Pi 4 LTS

2023-02-10 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-02-10, Diederik de Haas wrote: Nice summary! > On Friday, 10 February 2023 16:57:07 CET Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:06:10AM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: >> > Is Orange Pi 4 LTS (arm64) supported in Debian. ... >> OrangePi themselves have a version of Debian

Re: Support for Orange Pi 4 LTS

2023-02-10 Thread Diederik de Haas
I'll give a general answer to the best of my knowledge, which may be flawed and/or incomplete. Hopefully others will add to and/or correct me. On Friday, 10 February 2023 16:57:07 CET Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:06:10AM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: > > Is Orange Pi 4

Re: neon: armhf baseline for next release ?

2023-02-10 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Friday, 10 February 2023 22:30:18 CET Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This does not sound quite correct either: while no new SoCs have come > out without NEON for ten years now (the last ones were Tegra 2, I recently brought my Asus Transformer TF-101 'back to life' and was absolutely thrilled that I s

Re: neon: armhf baseline for next release ?

2023-02-10 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023, at 19:23, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2023-02-10, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:43 PM Andreas Tille wrote: >> [...] >>> according to the build logs[1] armhf fails to build (as only >>> architecture) with >> [...] >>> LLVM ERROR: Symbol not found: __sy

Re: neon: armhf baseline for next release ?

2023-02-10 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2023-02-10, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:43 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > [...] >> according to the build logs[1] armhf fails to build (as only >> architecture) with > [...] >> LLVM ERROR: Symbol not found: __sync_fetch_and_add_4 > > I see that abel.d.o porterbox is offline.

Re: Support for Orange Pi 4 LTS

2023-02-10 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:06:10AM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: > Hi, > > Is Orange Pi 4 LTS (arm64) supported in Debian. > > Christian > Hi Christian, This may well depend on the board support package: I didn't note it on the current list of supported systems but I note that OrangePi thems

neon: armhf baseline for next release ? (was: python-cogent fails to build on armhf )

2023-02-10 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Dear arm porters, On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:43 PM Andreas Tille wrote: [...] > according to the build logs[1] armhf fails to build (as only > architecture) with [...] > LLVM ERROR: Symbol not found: __sync_fetch_and_add_4 I see that abel.d.o porterbox is offline. There is currently no other porte

Support for Orange Pi 4 LTS

2023-02-10 Thread Christian Marillat
Hi, Is Orange Pi 4 LTS (arm64) supported in Debian. Christian