On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:46:22 +0300
Reco wrote:
>>IMO that's expected from fuse.
But even root couldn't chown. I don't recall this difficulty with
raspberryOS before. Do you mean that fuse is not correctable? \
What woukd happen if I removed the 'pi' user account?
This is why I started a ne
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:46:22 +0300
Reco wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>>On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 08:32:14PM +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
>>> I'm looking for suggestions for a new SBC, please. Ideally something
>>> more than 2M RAM. I see that a few a happy with Pine laptops. Does
>>> this translate to th
On 2021.09.07 18:36, lkcl wrote:
On September 7, 2021 4:16:27 PM UTC, Pete Batard wrote:
And my point is that, since we are dealing with non free systems, it
makes little difference whether the non-free blobs reside in an EEPROM
or on boot media.
it makes ALL the difference in the world.
On September 7, 2021 4:16:27 PM UTC, Pete Batard wrote:
>And my point is that, since we are dealing with non free systems, it
>makes little difference whether the non-free blobs reside in an EEPROM
>or on boot media.
it makes ALL the difference in the world.
not only is it deeply unethical
On 2021.09.07 15:55, Reco wrote:
It's illogical, but still - as long as the device has non-modifiable
firmware it's considered good, proper and "free".
If said firmware can be modified (as in - reflashed in EEPROM), or worse
- the device requires firmware to be uploaded on it at every poweron -
o
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 08:32:14PM +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> G'day
>
> I've been following the recent thread Subject: Re: Debian on Pine64
> H64B?
>
> I'm looking for suggestions for a new SBC, please. Ideally something
> more than 2M RAM. I see that a few a happy with Pine laptops. Does
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 03:02:20PM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2021.09.07 13:31, Reco wrote:
> > Yet there's a difference. Intel ME or AMD PSP do not require firmware to
> > be written on a boot media, thus making the boot media redistributable
> > and (other blobs excluded) - DFSG-compliant.
>
On 2021.09.07 13:31, Reco wrote:
Yet there's a difference. Intel ME or AMD PSP do not require firmware to
be written on a boot media, thus making the boot media redistributable
and (other blobs excluded) - DFSG-compliant.
I disagree.
The reason why the firmware needs to be written on boot medi
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 08:32:14PM +1000, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> I'm looking for suggestions for a new SBC, please. Ideally something
> more than 2M RAM. I see that a few a happy with Pine laptops. Does this
> translate to their SBC?
I'd suggest [1], but I'm unsure about the comple
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:00:29AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
> Hi Reco,
>
> On 2021.09.07 10:42, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:29:40AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
> > > Hi Gunnar,
> > >
> > > On 2021.09.06 18:59, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > > Gene Heskett dijo [Sat, Sep 0
G'day
I've been following the recent thread Subject: Re: Debian on Pine64
H64B?
I'm looking for suggestions for a new SBC, please. Ideally something
more than 2M RAM. I see that a few a happy with Pine laptops. Does this
translate to their SBC?
Thanks
Background.
I've just set up a new SDCard
Hi Reco,
On 2021.09.07 10:42, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:29:40AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
Hi Gunnar,
On 2021.09.06 18:59, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Gene Heskett dijo [Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 09:43:07AM -0400]:
(...)
So I found my own solutions. So, debian-arm, please make up
Hi.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:29:40AM +0100, Pete Batard wrote:
> Hi Gunnar,
>
> On 2021.09.06 18:59, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Gene Heskett dijo [Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 09:43:07AM -0400]:
> > > (...)
> > > So I found my own solutions. So, debian-arm, please make up your mind, do
> > > you su
Hi Gunnar,
On 2021.09.06 18:59, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Gene Heskett dijo [Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 09:43:07AM -0400]:
(...)
So I found my own solutions. So, debian-arm, please make up your mind, do
you support the pi's or do you NOT support the pi's?
Debian has a very clear line set: We do _NOT_ ship
On Sb, 04 sep 21, 08:31:11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-09-04, LinAdmin wrote:
> > The unnamed decision makers of Debian some unknown time ago
> > decided that Pi and Pine stuff won't be supported by Debian.
>
> I personally have added support in Debian for:
>
> Raspberry Pi 1
> Raspbe
15 matches
Mail list logo
