On 05/12/2020 20:26, Andreas Tille wrote:
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
I need to admit that I have no idea why this error occures on arm64.
According to reproducible builds, it's also happening on i386 and armhf,
it's showing a pass for amd64 but that could just be because it hasn't
been tested
On 05/12/20 at 17:19 +, peter green wrote:
> severity 976572 normal
> thanks
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64).
>
> It's cool that you have expanded your rebuild tests to include arm64, but it
> s
I pushed a commit that works around the _mm_malloc / xmmintrin.h issue ,
but there is usage of the rdtsc assembly operand that I don't have an arm64
analogue for.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 21:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 04:18:53PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >
Hello,
I have try to boot my TS-219 with kernel 5.9.0-4-marvell from USB.
Marvell>> fatload usb 0:1 0x80 kernel
reading kernel
2329698 bytes read
Marvell>> bootm 0x80
## Booting image at 0080 ...
Image Name: kernel 5.9.0-4-marvell
Created: 2020-12-05 19:50:52 UTC
Ima
on: FTBFS on arm64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64).
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > /
Hi Steve,
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 04:18:53PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> xmmintrin.h is fundamentally tied to x86-only SIMD intrinsics. Either
> the package doesn't support non-x86, or there's a bug and it's
> mis-detecting which platform you're on.
I guess the problem is that debian/rules
severity 976572 normal
thanks
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64).
It's cool that you have expanded your rebuild tests to include arm64, but it
seems
your test workflow needs some work. arm64 is not on the arc
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 05:11:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Control: tags -1 help
>
>Hi Debian Arm team,
>
>I'm sorry, I have no idea how to fix this. :-(
>
>Any help would be welcome
Looking at a few of these, the packaging for libxenium-dev tells
lies. It claims to be Architecture: all but i
Hey Andreas,
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 05:07:41PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Control: tags -1 help
>
>Hi Lucas,
>
>On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 01:15:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
>> on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on
gt; Justification: FTBFS on arm64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on arm64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > g++ -o /<>/build_sha
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Lucas,
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 01:15:52PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on amd64).
I admit I have currently no chance to test on arm64 but the package
builds
11 matches
Mail list logo
