On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:21 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting Ben Hutchings:
>>
>> Still, as armel will not be a release architecture any more, I suppose
>> it can diverge further from the normal configuration.
>
> I didn't know, that this already has been decided.
> Could you point to the em
* Roger Shimizu [2018-03-26 19:36]:
> So I want to know how many active users for D-Link DNS and QNAP devices now?
I don't think there were ever many DNS-323 users. QNAP has an active
user base but the hardware is aging, so I think they will be able to
cope without buster (especially if LTS stre
On 2018-03-27 17:29, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
>> As a related subject, I could compile a more stripped down version of
>> the armel kernel, put it for people to download and ask people to
>> comment if it works for them, so that we can gauge what peopl
Hi, Ben and others following the discussion.
On 2018-03-27 16:01, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 02:30 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> [...]
I will see if all the modules make sense for an embedded system like this
and I will send a list of options for opinions by others...
>
On Mar 27, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> As a related subject, I could compile a more stripped down version of
> the armel kernel, put it for people to download and ask people to
> comment if it works for them, so that we can gauge what people actually
> need from such a kernel...
Ple
Hi,Stefan.
On 2018-03-27 09:34, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Similarly for wifi cards like those Intel ones like iwlwifi (which is
>> the one that I have in this Core 2 Duo here)...
>
> I can answer this part: yes, you can definitely put an Intel wifi card
> in the mini-pcie slot of an ARM box.
Yes,
Quoting Ben Hutchings :
Still, as armel will not be a release architecture any more, I suppose
it can diverge further from the normal configuration.
I didn't know, that this already has been decided.
Could you point to the emails about this? Thanks!
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 21:21 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting Ben Hutchings :
> > Still, as armel will not be a release architecture any more, I
> > suppose
> > it can diverge further from the normal configuration.
>
> I didn't know, that this already has been decided.
> Could you point to
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 02:30 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
[...]
> > > I will see if all the modules make sense for an embedded system like this
> > > and I will send a list of options for opinions by others...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > As I see it, the point of installing Debian on little NAS boxes is
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 07:36:26PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> There's one possibility that can bring back qnap, or even D-Link DNS device:
> - create a new flavour for armel, such as armel-none-mini
> - the new flavour will disable many features that other common kernels
> have, such as wir
> Similarly for wifi cards like those Intel ones like iwlwifi (which is
> the one that I have in this Core 2 Duo here)...
I can answer this part: yes, you can definitely put an Intel wifi card
in the mini-pcie slot of an ARM box.
Stefan
11 matches
Mail list logo
