On 9/4/2017 12:37 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 04 September 2017 12:07:56 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> But aren't the huge majority of the wireless keyboards and mice just
>>> BT at the core? Max reliable range when the dong
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:37:13PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> But unless they are sneaking in under the FCC's radar, which they aren't
> else customs would padlock the container, it does have to be an FCC
> approved frequency and protocol in order to be able to label it with an
> FCC iD # of J
2 meters is pretty dead around here lately, using it as test signals
for my SDR. I use the NOAA weather transmitters around 162 MHz
instead. Yep, I had a 1st phone too, got it around 1976, gave it up
about 1982 because it got me nothing but minimum wage jobs and then I
spent 26 years working for
On Monday 04 September 2017 18:22:53 Alan Corey wrote:
> > But unless they are sneaking in under the FCC's radar, which they
> > aren't else customs would padlock the container, it does have to be
> > an FCC approved frequency and protocol in order to be able to label
> > it with an
>
> Actually,
On Monday 04 September 2017 13:26:46 Alan Corey wrote:
> Try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logitech_Unifying_receiver
> It's sort of like Bluetooth without pairing. Not sure about the FCC
> part but it's 2.4 GHz like Bluetooth or WiFi.
>
This mentioned solaar, so I installed it, big dbus mi
> But unless they are sneaking in under the FCC's radar, which they aren't
> else customs would padlock the container, it does have to be an FCC
> approved frequency and protocol in order to be able to label it with an
Actually, that's a good question since there's a ham band from
2300-2450 which
Try this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logitech_Unifying_receiver
It's sort of like Bluetooth without pairing. Not sure about the FCC
part but it's 2.4 GHz like Bluetooth or WiFi.
On 9/4/17, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 04 September 2017 12:07:56 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 28,
On Monday 04 September 2017 12:07:56 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > But aren't the huge majority of the wireless keyboards and mice just
> > BT at the core? Max reliable range when the dongles can see the
> > master is about 20 feet. I
It's an odd mishmash as I recall, there's a standard (theirs I think)
called "unifying" and there's some support for that outside of
Logitech's stuff. There are also Bluetooth and a few that are
switchable. I looked at it last in April by this:
https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:31:46AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> But aren't the huge majority of the wireless keyboards and mice just BT
> at the core? Max reliable range when the dongles can see the master is
> about 20 feet. I put the mouse in the box the pi is in, and had BT do a
> scan with
On 2017-09-04 10:06 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Edmund,
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > It seems to be possible to build this package on arm64.
> > Is there any reason why it would not work on arm64?
>
> It might be that tophat builds on other ar
Hi Edmund,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:37:38PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> It seems to be possible to build this package on arm64.
> Is there any reason why it would not work on arm64?
It might be that tophat builds on other architectures but it Depends
bowtie2 | bowtie and these are only
12 matches
Mail list logo
