Re: ARM Ports BoF: armel in buster

2017-09-01 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 19:27 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > [...] > > What matters for buster is gcc 8, and there is no current deprecation > in gcc that would affect the armel port. Thanks for all the info! > armel is a port on borrowed time since it supports old hardware > no longer supported else

Re: ARM Ports BoF: armel in buster

2017-09-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:57:40PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 06:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > > > > > However, I think armel is time to transit to v5. > > > > As someone who can no longer run Debian stable on his MI

Re: ARM Ports BoF: armel in buster

2017-09-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:53:54AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >... > OTOH the > only relevant hardware for armel these days seems to be RPi, so why > not make armel into armhfv6 instead? Incompatible ABI, your suggestion to move Raspbian as armhfv6 into Debian would therefore have to be a new port.

issues during Debian installation process

2017-09-01 Thread Damien Martins
Hi, I'm following this procedure: http://cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/qnap/ts-219/install/ to have a Debian stretch installed on my Kirkwood ARM based computer. I can start the debian installer, select a repo (I tried different from different places, US, UK, France), but during the "Download install