Re: [Pkg-d-devel] Bug#859667: libundead: FTBFS on armhf and ppc64el: tests fail

Στις 07-04-2017, ημέρα Παρ, και ώρα 18:03 +0200, ο/η Iain Buclaw έγραψε: > On 7 April 2017 at 16:02, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:22:28PM +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > > Which compiler? > > > > $ LANG=C apt-cache policy ldc > > ldc: > >   Installed: 1:1.1.1-1 > > > > > Are

Re: [Pkg-d-devel] Bug#859667: libundead: FTBFS on armhf and ppc64el: tests fail

On 7 April 2017 at 16:02, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:22:28PM +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> Which compiler? > > $ LANG=C apt-cache policy ldc > ldc: > Installed: 1:1.1.1-1 > >> Are NaNs being honoured? > > Hmmm, no idea how to check this. > Someone who maintains ldc might k

Re: [Pkg-d-devel] Bug#859667: libundead: FTBFS on armhf and ppc64el: tests fail

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:22:28PM +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote: > Which compiler? $ LANG=C apt-cache policy ldc ldc: Installed: 1:1.1.1-1 > Are NaNs being honoured? Hmmm, no idea how to check this. > What if you were to replace > the `(x != x && f != f)` comparison with `(isNaN(x) && isNaN(f))`