Re: Please give back prometheus on armel

2016-11-24 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 24/11/16 15:03, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> Those first few debug messages aren't the same in both runs. That >> "Maintenance >> loop stopped" happens earlier in the failing run. No idea if that's >> significant >> as I haven't looked at the code, but you may want to investigate that. Also >> si

Re: Bug#845193: dpkg: recent -specs PIE changes break openssl

2016-11-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Guillem Jover dixit: >> Yes, but they *do* break anything that >> - acts on the CFLAGS (and LDFLAGS) variables >> - uses klcc or other compiler wrappers that don't understand -specs >> - uses clang or pcc or whatever other compilers > >The default dpkg build flags have always been tied to the spec

Re: Bug#845193: dpkg: recent -specs PIE changes break openssl

2016-11-24 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:52:33 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > clone 845193 -1 > reassign -1 dpkg > retitle -1 dpkg: please do not add -specs= flags only on some architectures > thanks I'm afraid I'll have to wontfix this because it is not really implementable. See below… :/ > Guillem Jover

Re: Please give back prometheus on armel

2016-11-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:03:22AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >On 24/11/16 05:37, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> On 23/11/16 19:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> prometheus 1.2.3+ds2-2 failed to build on armel, but I am not being able to reproduce this failure in porter boxes. Can

Re: Bug#845193: dpkg: recent -specs PIE changes break openssl

2016-11-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
clone 845193 -1 reassign -1 dpkg retitle -1 dpkg: please do not add -specs= flags only on some architectures thanks Guillem Jover dixit: >> I cannot build openssl1.0 any longer. Downgrading all binary >> packages from src:dpkg to 1.18.10 makes the build succeed. Interestingly enough, src:openssl

Re: Please give back prometheus on armel

2016-11-24 Thread Martín Ferrari
Hi, On 24/11/16 11:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > henze is an armhf buildd that also builds armel, but antheil is an armel > buildd, > like abel, so that seems fine. weird :/ > However a recent build succeeded on henze[1]: Yes, but since many dependencies changed in the meantime, I did n

Re: Please give back prometheus on armel

2016-11-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 24/11/16 05:37, Martín Ferrari wrote: > On 23/11/16 19:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> prometheus 1.2.3+ds2-2 failed to build on armel, but I am not being able >>> to reproduce this failure in porter boxes. Can you please trigger a >>> rebuild to see if it was a transient problem? > >>