Re: Bug#837359: ocaml: FTBFS on -fPIE binNMU on armhf - test failure

2016-10-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 06:46:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: retitle -1 ocaml: FTBFS on -fPIE binNMU on armhf - test failure > > Dear maintainer, > > We have tried to binNMU ocaml in unstable now that PIE is on by default. > This worked fine on all release architectures except armhf

Re: Bug#837359: ocaml: FTBFS on -fPIE binNMU on armhf - test failure

2016-10-31 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: retitle -1 ocaml: FTBFS on -fPIE binNMU on armhf - test failure Dear maintainer, We have tried to binNMU ocaml in unstable now that PIE is on by default. This worked fine on all release architectures except armhf, where 4 tests failed: """ Summary: 468 test(s) passed 4 test(s) fa

Re: Release Architectures for Debian 9 'Stretch'

2016-10-31 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2016-10-31 13:31, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: The only change from Jessie is the removal of powerpc as a release architecture. ...and adding of mips64el. Oops. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.de

Release Architectures for Debian 9 'Stretch'

2016-10-31 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Release architectures for Stretch will be as follows: * amd64 * arm64 * armel * armhf * i386 * mips * mips64el * mipsel * ppc64el * s390x The only change from Jessie is the removal of powerpc as a release architecture. We discussed this at length, and eventually took the view