In that case, wouldn't it be easier if the script asked wether it's a 109 or
209 during setup? That would avoid this annoying bug.
What about OMV and packages reported as broken? Should I open a new thread for
this different problem?
Pat
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 13 sept 2016, a las 19:11,
* [ftp83plus] [2016-09-13 15:21]:
> From what I could find on Google, the problem comes from the fact
> the Debian installer can't tell the TS-109 from the TS 209 from one
> another. The TS-109 series don't have any fan, while the TS-209
> does.
This is correct. Fow now, you have to edit the qco
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:29 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> > tail /var/log/syslog reports
> > Sep 13 14:08:49 NASAD13D6 qcontrol[226]: ts209: fan error
>
> Well, I would try to find out why it is reporting an issue with
> the fan. Can it find (det
Wookey wrote:
Phil, could I persuade you to file a bug against debian-installer
Done; bug #837715
It sounds as if Hector knows what needs to be done and is working
on it. I'm able to test things on this board if that will help, at
least for the next few weeks. It might get "too important to
From what I could find on Google, the problem comes from the fact the Debian
installer can't tell the TS-109 from the TS 209 from one another. The TS-109
series don't have any fan, while the TS-209 does.
El 2016-09-13, a las 15:14, Mauricio Tavares escribió:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:29 PM, [
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:29 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> Thanks for this hint, what about this annoying beep? I could always desolder
> the buzzer, but that's not a "clean" solution.
>
> tail /var/log/syslog reports
> Sep 13 14:08:49 NASAD13D6 qcontrol[226]: ts209: fan error
Well, I would try
Thanks for this hint, what about this annoying beep? I could always desolder
the buzzer, but that's not a "clean" solution.
tail /var/log/syslog reports
Sep 13 14:08:49 NASAD13D6 qcontrol[226]: ts209: fan error
So I killed qcontrol, which stopped the beep, but not the logging of the error.
Is t
Hello,
On 09/13/2016 07:57 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> 1. I can't log in through SSH using root user. It denies me access even
> when I use the password set during setup. I can log in using the
> standard user, and perform "su" to get to root. How come root can't
> log in directly?
chec
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:57 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am a bit new to Debian, and when I laid my hands on an older Qnap TS-109,
> I decided to install it to overcome Qnap's firmware limitations. I followed
> the guide put up by Martin Michlmayr, but currently face three issues:
>
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:57:57PM -0400, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> I am a bit new to Debian, and when I laid my hands on an older Qnap TS-109, I
> decided to install it to overcome Qnap's firmware limitations. I followed the
> guide put up by Martin Michlmayr, but currently face three issues:
> I can
Hello all,
I am a bit new to Debian, and when I laid my hands on an older Qnap TS-109, I
decided to install it to overcome Qnap's firmware limitations. I followed the
guide put up by Martin Michlmayr, but currently face three issues:
I can't log in through SSH using root user. It denies me acce
Estimados Srs.
Quisieramos entrar en contacto con la persona encarga de compras de
servicios de Transporte de Carga de su organización, nos gustaría ofrecerles
nuestros servicios, por lo que agradecemos cualquier información que nos pueda
facilitar de contacto de la misma.
Puede ver nuestra n
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:58:30AM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> However, there is still one more issue when relocating initramfs and that
> needs
> CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS_48=y
> but I am told that breaks userland, so it might need to be reverted.
Well it "breaks" code that was wrong by design to beg
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:41:14PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
>Hello everybody,
>
>since 2016-09-05, the daily d-i builds on armhf and armel are
>incomplete. The builds fail in the library reduction step with a
>segfault during the mklibs run:
>
>-8<--8<--8<--8<---
Hello Phil,
2016-09-12 15:58 GMT+02:00 Phil Endecott :
>> Which BMC firmware are you using? AFAIK there is a broken DTB in the
>> manufacturer's firmware
>
>
> I replaced the shipped UEFI firmware (version D03 I think) with version
> F01 from http://b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=
On 13/09/2016 09:17, wrote:
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:47:34PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote:
(BTW, note "EFI v2.40 by American Megatrends". I think that the people
who've installed UEFI on their MP30-AR0 boards (which shipped with only
U-Boot) have installed t
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 14:45 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Centos may be choosing to explicitly prefer the ACPI in their kernel?
Given the downstream relationship with RHEL (who certainly do so in the
preview releases) I'd offer good odds that this was the case.
Ian.
17 matches
Mail list logo
