Re: Bricked QNAP HS-210

2016-09-12 Thread Philippe Clérié
On 09/12/2016 04:40 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Philippe Clérié [2016-09-12 16:19]: I managed to brick my QNAP HS-210 while trying to do a dist-upgrade to testing. Not my fault though, I blame the whole thing on byobu and a loss of power. Anyway, QNAP does have a firmware recovery procedure

Re: Bricked QNAP HS-210

2016-09-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Philippe Clérié [2016-09-12 16:19]: > I managed to brick my QNAP HS-210 while trying to do a dist-upgrade to > testing. Not my fault though, I blame the whole thing on byobu and a loss of > power. > > Anyway, QNAP does have a firmware recovery procedure which I'm prepared to > use, but I was wo

Bricked QNAP HS-210

2016-09-12 Thread Philippe Clérié
I managed to brick my QNAP HS-210 while trying to do a dist-upgrade to testing. Not my fault though, I blame the whole thing on byobu and a loss of power. Anyway, QNAP does have a firmware recovery procedure which I'm prepared to use, but I was wondering if there might be a faster way. My da

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Michael Howard
On 12/09/2016 21:49, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:33:12PM +0100, Michael Howard wrote: As mentioned in an earlier post, the debian installer didn't work with the AR0 board either. Debian are a bit behind the curve on these server boards. Could be interesting to compare the

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:33:12PM +0100, Michael Howard wrote: > As mentioned in an earlier post, the debian installer didn't work with the > AR0 board either. Debian are a bit behind the curve on these server boards. Could be interesting to compare the /boot/config file for the ubuntu and debian

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Michael Howard
On 12/09/2016 19:41, Phil Endecott wrote: The Ubuntu mini.iso installer from here: http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/yakkety/main/installer-arm64/current/images/netboot/ also works, with a 4.4.0 kernel: [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0 [0.00] Initializing cgrou

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Wookey
On 2016-09-12 19:41 +0100, Phil Endecott wrote: > The Ubuntu mini.iso installer from here: > > > http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/yakkety/main/installer-arm64/current/images/netboot/ > > also works, with a 4.4.0 kernel: > ACPI is disabled: > > [0.083487] ACPI: Interpreter disabl

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Phil Endecott
The Ubuntu mini.iso installer from here: http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/dists/yakkety/main/installer-arm64/current/images/netboot/ also works, with a 4.4.0 kernel: [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0 [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] Initializ

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Phil Endecott
lsore...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:47:34PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote: (BTW, note "EFI v2.40 by American Megatrends". I think that the people who've installed UEFI on their MP30-AR0 boards (which shipped with only U-Boot) have installed the open-source TianoCore. Th

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Michael Howard
On 12/09/2016 17:47, Phil Endecott wrote: So that's a 4.2 kernel which seems to be using ACPI. Presumably this is backported, or something. The sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch from 'https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!kernel.git' -- Mike Howard

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 05:47:34PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote: > Hector Oron wrote: > >using ACPI boot is recommended, > >however it is not supported until 4.7 kernel series > > I've had a look at what CentOS does: > > [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0 > [0.00] Initializing

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Phil Endecott
Hector Oron wrote: using ACPI boot is recommended, however it is not supported until 4.7 kernel series I've had a look at what CentOS does: [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0 [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [0.000

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 02:58:47PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote: > Hi Hector, > > Thanks for your reply. > > Hector Oron wrote: > >Which BMC firmware are you using? AFAIK there is a broken DTB in the > >manufacturer's firmware > > I replaced the shipped UEFI firmware (version D03 I think) with ver

Re: Daily d-i builds fail on armhf and armel with segfault in mklibs

2016-09-12 Thread Clint Adams
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:36:21PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: > CCing Clint Adams (fakeroot maintainer) in the hope that he might > be able to provide some further insight. I don't have access to my ARM devices this week but if I did I would try what's described in the gdb section of /usr/share/

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Phil Endecott
Hi Hector, Thanks for your reply. Hector Oron wrote: Which BMC firmware are you using? AFAIK there is a broken DTB in the manufacturer's firmware I replaced the shipped UEFI firmware (version D03 I think) with version F01 from http://b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5912#bios

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Wookey
On 2016-09-12 09:03 +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello, > > 2016-09-09 19:29 GMT+02:00 Phil Endecott : > > > EFI stub: Booting Linux Kernel... > > ConvertPages: Incompatible memory types > > EFI stub: EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL unavailable, no randomness supplied > > EFI stub: Using DTB from configuration t

Re: Gigabyte MP30-AR1

2016-09-12 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2016-09-09 19:29 GMT+02:00 Phil Endecott : > EFI stub: Booting Linux Kernel... > ConvertPages: Incompatible memory types > EFI stub: EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL unavailable, no randomness supplied > EFI stub: Using DTB from configuration table Which BMC firmware are you using? AFAIK there is a broke