Re: Broadcom BCM2709, ARMv8, and missing CPU features

2016-07-27 Thread Jeffrey Walton
>> Using '.byte' below rather than '.inst' or '.inst.w' is another can of >> worms... > > And if I'm not mistaken, the part of the reason why you got the > instructions wrong... > >> $ gcc -g3 -O0 -march=armv7-a -mfpu=neon test.cc -o test.exe >> $ ./test.exe >> $ > > Does the tool-chain default to

Re: Broadcom BCM2709, ARMv8, and missing CPU features

2016-07-27 Thread Tixy
On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 00:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Using '.byte' below rather than '.inst' or '.inst.w' is another can of > worms... And if I'm not mistaken, the part of the reason why you got the instructions wrong... > $ gcc -g3 -O0 -march=armv7-a -mfpu=neon test.cc -o test.exe > $ ./

Re: Broadcom BCM2709, ARMv8, and missing CPU features

2016-07-27 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >> I recently purchased a Raspberry Pi 3. Its got a Broadcom SoC, and its >> ARMv8. > ... >> model name: ARMv7 Processor rev 4 (v7l) > > Looks like you are running it in ARMv7 32-bit m

Re: Broadcom BCM2709, ARMv8, and missing CPU features

2016-07-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Alan Corey wrote: > Yes, so they claim and I wonder how they're going to deal with the > fact that some Pis are 32 bit and some 64. ISTR that they plan on keeping 32-bit for the official stuff recommended by the RPi folks for simplification. -- bye, pabs https:

Re: Broadcom BCM2709, ARMv8, and missing CPU features

2016-07-27 Thread Alan Corey
> 64-bit/ARMv8 on the RPi3 is still in progress. Yes, so they claim and I wonder how they're going to deal with the fact that some Pis are 32 bit and some 64. I posted this question there but I haven't looked into the links in the response a lot: https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f

xbmc wheezy is not working on ST' Microectronic ST'301 based custom board

2016-07-27 Thread nagaraja
Hi All, I am trying to get debian wheezy xbmc running ( since it uses glibc-2.13.2( on board i got 2.14) on my ST301 based custom Using ST's SDK2-20 with 3.10.65 kernel version, and arm-linux based rootfs for typical set-top-box environment providded by ST Single core ARM Cortex TM -A9 appl

Re: ARM64 (was: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC16)

2016-07-27 Thread Wookey
On 2016-07-27 00:53 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >> The Mustang board is a nice test platform because its an early ARMv8 > >> board. While its ARMv8, it lacks CRC and Crypto extensions. > > > > That's interesting. Having almost given up on any AMD ARM > > hardware ever appearing, I've been consi