Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:01 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: [...] > > >  * rebuilt d-i to match that kernel > > > > You know there are patches around for that. > > > > >  * X drivers > > > > I don't see backports for them. > > libdrm2: 2.4.68-1~bpo8+1 > libgl1-mesa-.*: 11.1.3-1~bpo8+1 > xserve

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On 4 July 2016 at 09:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04): >> There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some >> other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, >> similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* ju

Re: SD card device name changed on wandboard quad.

2016-07-04 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:51:20AM +0100, Tixy wrote: > There was a heated discussion [1] I remembered and in there it points > out change that fixed a regression in this area: commit 9aaf3437aa72 > ("mmc: block: Use the mmc host device index as the mmcblk device index") > I don't is that's directl

Re: SD card device name changed on wandboard quad.

2016-07-04 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:48:53AM +0100, peter green wrote: > While upgrading a wandboard quad from 4.4 to 4.6 (debian armmp kernels) I > got a boot failure. I tracked this down to the device name for the SD card > changing from mmcblk0 to mmcblk2 > > Any idea why this has changed? There don't se

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 14:01 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey folks, > > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > similarly to what we did in the etch days. As I recall, that added extra packages

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
(Please keep me cc'd.) Philipp Kern (2016-07-04): > On 2016-07-04 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04): > >>There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > >>other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > >>similarly to what w

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Jose R R
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey folks, > > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just > like a normal jes

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2016-07-04 15:12, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04): There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just like a normal jess

Re: Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Steve McIntyre (2016-07-04): > There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some > other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, > similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just > like a normal jessie release, but with a few key upd

Thinking about a "jessie and a half" release

2016-07-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hey folks, There's something I've been pondering for a while, along with some other folks - it might be useful to do a "jessie and a half" release, similarly to what we did in the etch days. That's *basically* just like a normal jessie release, but with a few key updates: * backports kernel * r