On 2015-11-19 at 10:54:36 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Are there particular haskell packages which could be relevant to a
> NAS-type installation or other minimal installation-size server setup?
> Typical armel devices don't have endless Gb of storage for the rootfs.
There is also pandoc, which i
On 2015-11-19, Pierre wrote:
> I've bootstrapped Jessie on my Cubox-i 4 following instructions from
> http://techieventures.blogspot.ca/2014/10/install-debian-jessie-with-debian-u.html.
I'd recommend trying the images for debian-installer instead, as those
*should* set up booting correctly:
ht
Hello,
I've bootstrapped Jessie on my Cubox-i 4 following instructions from
http://techieventures.blogspot.ca/2014/10/install-debian-jessie-with-debian-u.html.
Now, I want to use a USB hard drive for the root filesystem instead of the MMC.
I've changed the /boot/uEnv.txt file to point at /dev/sda1
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:20:21 +0100
Richard Hartmann wrote:
> So armel is the port with the most installations within the arm
> ecosystem.
armel installs, at least via the vagaries of popcon, have been falling
since 2012, down by ~50% in that time.
http://popcon.debian.org/stat/sub-armel.png
arm
So armel is the port with the most installations within the arm ecosystem.
Can we get stats about how many packages are on a specific architecture.
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
Is there a list of hardware that's armel?
Popcon stats might help.
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> Is there a use case for haskell on armel that anyone knows / cares
> about? That would determine whether haskell could be removed without
> worries about it being a one-way change.
>
> Are there particular haskell packages which could be rele
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:31:28 +0100
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we need a decision about what to do with Haskell on armel.
Is there a use case for haskell on armel that anyone knows / cares
about? That would determine whether haskell could be removed without
worries about it being a one-wa
Hi,
we need a decision about what to do with Haskell on armel.
Recall that the Haskell compiler GHC has recently improved its support
for (recent forms of) ARM, and a new release (7.10.3) with that is
expected real soon. This has been sitting in experimental for far too
long, and as soon as 7.10.
9 matches
Mail list logo
