Re: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC15

2015-09-13 Thread Björn Wetterbom
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make > noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported > in future. > I'd hate to see my two QNAP NAS:es unsupported. Setting them up again with new hardwar

Re: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC15

2015-09-13 Thread Wookey
+++ Philippe Clérié [2015-09-13 20:14 -0400]: > On 09/11/2015 11:58 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > >Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make > >noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported > >in future. > > > > Thanks for that post. Very timely, as

Re: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC15

2015-09-13 Thread Philippe Clérié
On 09/11/2015 11:58 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: Summary: if people care about armel for Stretch, they should make noise NOW and convince people it's needed and can/should be supported in future. Thanks for that post. Very timely, as I was about to recommend some QNAP hardware because of armel

lacie network space v2: upgrade from wheezy to jessie

2015-09-13 Thread Luca Olivetti
Hello, apologies if this is the wrong list. I'm currently running debian wheezy on a lacie network space v2. I'd like to dist-upgrade it to jessie. Is it reasonably safe to do so? I can get access to a serial console, but I'd avoid it (IIRC the pins are difficult to reach). TIA -- Luca

Re: Summary of the ARM ports BoF at DC15

2015-09-13 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 23:26 +0100, Wookey wrote: > +++ Ian Campbell [2015-09-12 15:55 +0100]: > > > The other two subarches in the kernel are orion5x and versatile. I > have > > no personal interest in either. My gut suggests that orion5x (the > > Marvell variant prior to kirkwood) is the one peop