Re: Packages built for arm64 with old toolchain, Aug 3-9

2015-09-04 Thread Wookey
+++ Edmund Grimley Evans [2015-09-04 19:19 +0100]: > I've already filed a few individual bugs, for cases that seem > particularly pernicious, but with no effect, so far: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795288 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797758 > https

Re: Packages built for arm64 with old toolchain, Aug 3-9

2015-09-04 Thread Edmund Grimley Evans
> I think we should look through the list and actively bin-nmu anything > that looks like it might be affected, to avoid knock-on breakage. So should we file individual bugs, or just tell someone? I would have thought that at most times a binNMU on a single architecture would be a harmless thing

Re: Packages built for arm64 with old toolchain, Aug 3-9

2015-09-04 Thread Wookey
+++ Edmund Grimley Evans [2015-09-04 11:56 +0100]: > The buildd arm-arm-03 failed to update its chroot on Aug 2. As a > result, in the period Aug 3-9 it built various packages using g++-4.9 > when people were expecting it to use g++-5. So there are library > packages, such as libsigc++-2.0-0v5, whi

Re: Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-09-04 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2015-09-04 3:38 GMT+02:00 Rob Browning : > Rob Browning writes: > >> You mean -O0, perhaps? > > Actually, there may be a mistake in the current rules file which is > causing it to always build without an -O flag... > > Changing the rules to work correctly (to use -O2 as you mentioned) > ap

Re: Modifying kernel bootargs

2015-09-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 09:19 +0100, Tim Fletcher wrote: > On 03/09/15 17:56, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 18:00 +0200, JM wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I can't seem to figure out how to pass kernel parameters using flash > > > -kernel. This is with flash-kernel 3.45 and linux-image-

Re: Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-09-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 09/04/2015 03:38 AM, Rob Browning wrote: > Rob Browning writes: > >> You mean -O0, perhaps? > > Actually, there may be a mistake in the current rules file which is > causing it to always build without an -O flag... > > Changing the rules to work correctly (to use -O2 as you mentioned) > appe

Packages built for arm64 with old toolchain, Aug 3-9

2015-09-04 Thread Edmund Grimley Evans
The buildd arm-arm-03 failed to update its chroot on Aug 2. As a result, in the period Aug 3-9 it built various packages using g++-4.9 when people were expecting it to use g++-5. So there are library packages, such as libsigc++-2.0-0v5, which are intended to handle the transition to GCC 5 but were

Re: Modifying kernel bootargs

2015-09-04 Thread Tim Fletcher
On 03/09/15 17:56, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 18:00 +0200, JM wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I can't seem to figure out how to pass kernel parameters using flash >> -kernel. This is with flash-kernel 3.45 and linux-image-kirkwood 4.1.0-2 >> from testing on QNAP TS-212P. >> >> I edit the LIN