On 2015-01-02, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 13:42 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> On 2014-12-30, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> I think the difference is one is a set of netboot images, and the other
>> is a set of hd-media images.
>
> But what is the difference between these two things
Karsten Merker (2015-01-02):
> > (Do your patches end up adding the correct Built-Using on u-boot?)
>
> No, they don't, but d-i does not do that for similar components
> on other platforms (syslinux/isolinux/grub) as well. Probably we
> should do that, but then it would have to be done for all
>
On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 01:59 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> > 0001-Add-boot-arm-u-boot-image-config.patch
> >
> > Seems fine.
> >
> > 0002-Provide-u-boot-binaries-for-armhf-systems-without-u-.patch
>
> > I think this isn't actually publishing the u-boot binaries, but
> > r
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 13:42 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2014-12-30, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > 0004-Add-SD-card-image-build-support-for-hd-media-builds-.patch
> ...
> > It seems to be creating a copy of dtbs again, please lets try
> > and keep it to one set of these files
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015, Rainer H. Rauschenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jan 2015, Rainer H. Rauschenberg wrote:
>
> > My question: Does it seem like a good idea to place a line with
> > "flash-kernel" into /etc/rc.local ? Once this happened I would shut down
> > the system (power-button of the Slug, rede
5 matches
Mail list logo
