Re: Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf

2014-12-25 Thread peter green
peter green wrote: Matthias Klose wrote: there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). Disabling stack protector also seems to result in a succesful compile (reducing it from strong to regular does not). And another workaround is to use -marm. -- T

Re: Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf

2014-12-25 Thread peter green
Matthias Klose wrote: there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). Disabling stack protector also seems to result in a succesful compile (reducing it from strong to regular does not). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Re: Debian in a Pcduino3

2014-12-25 Thread Karsten Merker
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 09:28:53PM +0100, Patrice Go wrote: > I am searching some technical informations to know if it is > possible to install a debian OS in a pcduino3. I was searching > on the debian arm iso ftp, but i don't know what is the arm iso > (armel or armhf) to choose for the pcduino

Re: Debian in a Pcduino3

2014-12-25 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 21:28:53 +0100 Patrice Go wrote: > Hello the list, > > I am searching some technical informations to know if it is possible > to install a debian OS in a pcduino3. I was searching on the debian > arm iso ftp, but i don't know what is the arm iso (armel or armhf) to > choose f

Debian in a Pcduino3

2014-12-25 Thread Patrice Go
Hello the list, I am searching some technical informations to know if it is possible to install a debian OS in a pcduino3. I was searching on the debian arm iso ftp, but i don't know what is the arm iso (armel or armhf) to choose for the pcduino3. It seems that it is an arm v7, then maybe the armh

Re: Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf

2014-12-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 + help this is not seen on the gcc-4.9 Linaro branch, so a ARM porter should identify the relevant backport. On 12/25/2014 06:12 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > the escalation is wrong. there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the > optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). I asked