I'm experimenting with ways to make ARM Debian installer images
available for testing on real ARM hardware via the linux-image-armmp
support and LAVA.
I've done some basic testing with ARMMP on iMX.53 and I have a variety
of other boards available at home for testing. (BeagleBoneBlack,
arndale, iM
Control: forwarded 754199
https://code.google.com/p/rimeime/issues/detail?id=632
Control: tag 754199 + upstream
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I would rather drop any package which does use
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 00:08:28 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > But this seems toi be a bug porter amd GCC maintainer has to address.
> > If they can not, we should drop armel from Debian.
> I would rather drop any package which does
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 10:27:00AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 16:33 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:03:30PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I think the patch below resolves the worst issue and it works for me on
> > > cubietruck.
> > >
> > >
Hi
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any
> reflection.
I now understand the problem. Thanks.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> No, just because some random c++1
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:04 +0200, drEagle wrote:
> Agree with you, it's an important missing part from the mainline u-boot for
> the SheevaPlug.
>
> I have already made some tries to do so, but never successed... for now.
My main advice would be to CC the right folks from
http://www.denx.de/wi
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 00:08:28 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> But this seems toi be a bug porter amd GCC maintainer has to address.
> If they can not, we should drop armel from Debian.
I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any
reflection. The c++11 status in GCC (and
Hi all, (please CC me)
I'm currently investigating a build failure for Tatan on armel and
armhf. Tatan was written in D.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tatan&suite=unstable
I can't make much sense of the error message since the only relevant
change between the last revision and t
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 16:33 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Control: tags 751816 patch
>
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:03:30PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I think the patch below resolves the worst issue and it works for me on
> > cubietruck.
> >
> > The more minor stuff mentioned in that rep
9 matches
Mail list logo