Great, let me try it on mips64el.
I met some trouble for openjdk-6 and openjdk-7.
Wish openjdk-8 works :-)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenJDK 8 is being packaged [1] and I'm looking for porters willing to
> try and compile it on other architectures. So far it
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 09:08 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 04:28:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Given that, it seems like a good time to add arm64 to src:linux with a
> > > configuration that will run on a
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 04:28:45PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Given that, it seems like a good time to add arm64 to src:linux with a
> > configuration that will run on at least a typical QEMU ARM64 emulation.
>
> AIUI qemu 2.0 only does
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:28 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:30 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:27:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > > You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming.
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:28 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> That said I can't see any reason not to get started on an arm64 kernel.
Except:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sbuild-build-depends-linux-dummy : Depends: python but it is not going to be
installed
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:30 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:27:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> > > arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' an
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:30 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 02:27:01AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> > arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
> > CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from i
Ian Campbell (2014-04-20):
> The kernel is in svn still, which is what I meant there.
Yeah, sorry, I didn't read carefully enough.
> I plan to push:
> armhf: move armmp subarch to the toplevel.
> arm: include dtb files for netboot.
> to d-i master shortly (once this quick test in
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 16:13 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ian Campbell (2014-04-19):
> > Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
> > the installer setup a bit.
> >
> > Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondly by
> > dropping the
On 20 April 2014 15:03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote:
>> gitorious seems to have problems at the moment (trying to access
>> the web interface gives "bad gateway", running git clone gives
>> timeouts).
>
> It does seem to be down right now :-/.
>
> Which
Ian Campbell (2014-04-20):
> On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote:
> > gitorious seems to have problems at the moment (trying to access
> > the web interface gives "bad gateway", running git clone gives
> > timeouts).
>
> It does seem to be down right now :-/.
>
> Which means I can
Hi,
Ian Campbell (2014-04-19):
> Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
> the installer setup a bit.
>
> Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondly by
> dropping the version from the kernel filename. Leading to
> installer-armhf/201
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote:
> gitorious seems to have problems at the moment (trying to access
> the web interface gives "bad gateway", running git clone gives
> timeouts).
It does seem to be down right now :-/.
Which means I can't push the bugfix I've just made, which is
On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 07:50:07PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
> > the installer setup a bit.
> >
> > Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondl
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 07:50:07PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Now that armhf only has a single kernel flavour I think we can simplify
> the installer setup a bit.
>
> Firstly by moving the armmp subarch to the top level and secondly by
> dropping the version from the kernel filename. Leading to
15 matches
Mail list logo
