Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Dale Amon wrote: > However many of us who are silent have found this to be > one of the more interesting discussions on the business > and industry of SoC that have come along in a very long > time. Definitely a high S/N. > > I say this as someone in early stages

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 12/24/2013 10:44 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 12/24/2013 6:37 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: jerry: i apologise - there are too many judgements and assumptions for me to be able to continue this conversation, espe

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > On 12/24/2013 6:37 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> >> jerry: i apologise - there are too many judgements and assumptions for >> me to be able to continue this conversation, especially without >> consultancy fees being paid. i've g

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 12/24/2013 8:07 AM, Dale Amon wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 11:37:07AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: jerry: i apologise - there are too many judgements and assumptions for me to be able to continue this conversation, especially without consultancy fees being paid. i've given yo

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 12/24/2013 6:37 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: jerry: i apologise - there are too many judgements and assumptions for me to be able to continue this conversation, especially without consultancy fees being paid. i've given you a lot of advice: you're not listening to it. you may also

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 12/24/2013 5:02 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: On 2013-12-22 at 23:09:39 -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Let's try this again. I'm still looking for a good ARM board for Debian. I thought the Olinuxino A10s board would work until I found out recently that Allwinner has stopped making the SDK

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Dale Amon wrote: > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 11:37:07AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> jerry: i apologise - there are too many judgements and assumptions for >> me to be able to continue this conversation, especially without >> consultancy fees being p

Re: maintainer communication

2013-12-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 22:14:00 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > My intent in _this_ thread was to get a discussion among > debian-ports.org users started for best practices of how > to communicate with package maintainers in Debian. Sorry > for being unclear there. I had hoped for hints ☺ since I

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Dale Amon
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 11:37:07AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > jerry: i apologise - there are too many judgements and assumptions for > me to be able to continue this conversation, especially without > consultancy fees being paid. i've given you a lot of advice: you're > not liste

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
jerry: i apologise - there are too many judgements and assumptions for me to be able to continue this conversation, especially without consultancy fees being paid. i've given you a lot of advice: you're not listening to it. you may also wish to bear in mind that the client is going to be able to

Re: Good ARM board for Debian?

2013-12-24 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2013-12-22 at 23:09:39 -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > Let's try this again. I'm still looking for a good ARM board for > Debian. I thought the Olinuxino A10s board would work until I found > out recently that Allwinner has stopped making the SDK as of last > February. Did you look at the oth

Re: maintainer communication

2013-12-24 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Finn Thain wrote: >> >Why is CONFIG_SERIAL_PMACZILOG to be disabled? And why was >> >> See the discussion in the thread before this message. > > I've seen no discussion of this on debian-68k or linux-m68k. What > discussion are you referring to? > > The subject of