Hi,
Quoting peter green (2013-11-28 01:12:57)
> One problem with these metrics is that you get source packages whose
> importance is artifically inflated because of the way our source packages
> work. If anything in a source package needs x then the whole source package
> has to build-depend on x.
Instead of dwelling on this discovery, which is not productive, why not
concentrate on what to do to improve Debian.
The analysis has shown faults. Has Debian stopped working? Has the world
crashed?
The problems have been identified, the patches to address the issues are being
evaluated and
On 28 November 2013 00:04, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi josch!
>
> On 27/11/13 17:58, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>> http://mister-muffin.de/p/Gid8.txt
>>
>> One can see that now the amount of source packages which is needed to build
>> the
>> rest of the archive is only 383.
>
> So, there are 383
Johannes Schauer wrote:
Hi,
the following is a report of a successful implementation of what I have been
talking about with Niels Thykier during debconf13. The question was how
important it is for a source package to be compilable or exist in the first
place given an incomplete port which is in
Hi josch!
On 27/11/13 17:58, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> http://mister-muffin.de/p/Gid8.txt
>
> One can see that now the amount of source packages which is needed to build
> the
> rest of the archive is only 383.
So, there are 383 packages that share the same, maximum value (in this
case 11657) i
Hi,
the following is a report of a successful implementation of what I have been
talking about with Niels Thykier during debconf13. The question was how
important it is for a source package to be compilable or exist in the first
place given an incomplete port which is in the process of being boots
6 matches
Mail list logo
