Re: Build failure for armhf/armmp, linux 3.11-rc4

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:39:40AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 11:41 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Could you be more specific as to what you believe the problem that > > exists is? You mentioned that the kernel would be tainted but that > > doesn't seem like a not working t

Re: Build failure for armhf/armmp, linux 3.11-rc4

On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 11:41 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:25:44PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 11:34 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Please use the advertised e-mail addresses for maintainers. > > > Expand, please? I took your address from the co

Re: Arm bof and raspbian.

Wookey wrote: +++ Wookey [2013-08-17 11:44 +0100]: Doko does not like the separate compiler-defaults package, arguing that each compiler sets its defaults in different ways and that this is not a common-source thing. Consider llvm as well as the various GNU compilers. Even if it was limit

Re: Build failure for armhf/armmp, linux 3.11-rc4

On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:25:44PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 11:34 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > Please use the advertised e-mail addresses for maintainers. > Expand, please? I took your address from the commit that Robert pointed > out. You're better off with MAINTAINE