On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> >> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
> >>
> >> > * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
> >> > the machines we u
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
>>
>> > * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
>> > the machines we use.
>>
>>
>> afair buildd are:
>> marvell DB-78x00 -> should be supported b
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Arnaud Patard wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
>
> > * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
> > the machines we use.
>
>
> afair buildd are:
> marvell DB-78x00 -> should be supported by armel kernel flavour mx78xx0
>
Martin Zobel-Helas writes:
> [please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port
> specific list when replying.]
>
> Comrades!
>
> At our recent Essen sprint, DSA went through the release qualification
> matrix (for wheezy, as there isn't one for jessie, yet) and defined a
> set
* Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@debian.org) wrote:
> [please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port
> specific list when replying.]
>
> * armel: no remote management (being worked on); no archive kernel for
> the machines we use.
>
> * armhf: no remote management (being work
[please consider replacing debian-ports@ldo with the appropriate port
specific list when replying.]
Comrades!
At our recent Essen sprint, DSA went through the release qualification
matrix (for wheezy, as there isn't one for jessie, yet) and defined a
set of requirements that we consider necessary
6 matches
Mail list logo