On 05/08/2013 03:19:23 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> whereas the EOMA initiative is at the complete opposite end of the
>> spectrum. and products based around the EOMA standards, although
>> there is a cost overhead of e.g. aroun
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:23:19PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
>On Wednesday 08 May 2013, Wookey wrote:
>>
>> Don't forget to re-install everything, not just stuff that has a new
>> verison number (dpkg --reinstall, probably combined with a
>--reinstall does not exist in either the command help
On Wednesday 08 May 2013, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Phil Endecott [2013-05-08 09:13 +]:
> > Wookey wookware.org> writes:
> > > Your original install was built before the name for the armhf linker
> > > was agreed between distros. Once it was agreed (with a different path
> > > to the one Debian orig
+++ Phil Endecott [2013-05-08 09:13 +]:
> Wookey wookware.org> writes:
> > Your original install was built before the name for the armhf linker
> > was agreed between distros. Once it was agreed (with a different path
> > to the one Debian originally picked) everything had to be
> > (incompati
Phil Endecott wrote:
Hmmm. It's disappointing that apt didn't know about this. Isn't this sort
of compatibility between packages exactly the sort of thing that it is
supposed to track?
One option in theory would be a massive breaks list in the new libc
package. I'm not sure howwell tools w
* Mark Small [2013-05-08 06:33]:
> Am I safe to upgrade?
Yes.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201305081115
Hi there,
I'm getting ready to upgrade my QNAP TS-219P to wheezy, and I want to be sure
that everything will go as planned. I'm a little spooked by Martin
Michlmayr's post:
http://www.cyrius.com/journal/debian/wheezy-upgrade.tbm
In it he says that people with plug computers need to be carefu
Wookey wookware.org> writes:
> +++ Phil Endecott [2013-05-07 20:36 +]:
>
> > I eventually discovered that things would run if I invoked the dynamic
> > linker directly:
> >
> > # /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 /bin/ls
> >
> > I was then able to establish that my existing executables want a dynami
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:19:23AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> >> whereas the EOMA initiative is at the complete opposite end of the
> >> spectrum. and products based around the EOMA standards, although
> >> there is a cost
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> whereas the EOMA initiative is at the complete opposite end of the
>> spectrum. and products based around the EOMA standards, although
>> there is a cost overhead of e.g. around $6 in parts for EOMA-68, there
>> is a whopping great saving of
10 matches
Mail list logo
