Re: armel *and* armhf qualification for Wheezy

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:18:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: >> >Hi Steve, >> >> Hey Mike, >> >> >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>

Re: armel qualification for Wheezy

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 06:00:18AM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 00:59 +0100, peter green wrote: >> The statement that all but one armel buildd is at the same location >> disagrees with >> the debian machines database. >[...] >> Metropolitan Area Network Darmstadt : arcadelt >>