On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 00:59 +0100, peter green wrote:
> The statement that all but one armel buildd is at the same location disagrees
> with
> the debian machines database.
[...]
> Metropolitan Area Network Darmstadt : arcadelt
> DG-i: argento
They may still be physically located there, but:
wan
I found the answers here
http://wiki.debian.org/KernelModuleBlacklisting
and https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Blacklisting#Blacklisting
When /etc/modprobe.d/ipv6.conf contains 'install ipv6 /bin/false'
ipv6 is successfully not loaded.
The problem I had with flash-kernel returning code 1 whe
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be appreciated,
as would any other information you think is relevant to helping us
determine armel's status for the release.
The statement that all but one armel buildd is at the
On 15 May 2012, at 22:00, Alan Snelgrove wrote:
>
> On 15 May 2012, at 21:10, John Winters wrote:
>
>> On 15/05/12 18:46, Alan Snelgrove wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> I have read that adding ipv6.disable=1 to the kernel
>>> line in the bootloader configuration fixes the problem.
>>>
>>> But I don't kno
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:56:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >Hi Steve,
>
> Hey Mike,
>
> >On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
> >
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:44:10PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>Hi Steve,
Hey Mike,
>On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
>> memory is more of a limiting factor with bigger C++ builds.
>
>As maintainer o
Hi Steve,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:26:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> In terms of raw buildd CPU right now, I think we're doing OK, but
> memory is more of a limiting factor with bigger C++ builds.
As maintainer of such a package that pushes buildds limits, I have a
question.
Isn't memory r
[ Responding for both armel and armhf ]
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:46PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
>we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
>architectures for the Wheezy release.
>
>Co
Hi,
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the Wheezy release.
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html wou
Hi,
With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our ears,
we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of release
architectures for the Wheezy release.
Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html wou
10 matches
Mail list logo
