Re: armel v4t vs v5

2012-04-18 Thread Wookey
+++ Martin Guy [2012-04-18 14:30 +0200]: > On 17 April 2012 18:36, Wookey wrote: > > debian armel is currently > > built for v4t but is likely to move forward to v5 at some point. > > -1 as we have and others have products that are arm4vt and that ship > with Debian as its standard system. It'l

Re: armhf multiarch tuple

2012-04-18 Thread Paul Brook
> On 17 April 2012 18:36, Wookey wrote: > > debian armel is currently > > built for v4t but is likely to move forward to v5 at some point. > > -1 as we have and others have products that are arm4vt and that ship > with Debian as its standard system. How big is the speed advantage for > v5 users w

Re: armhf multiarch tuple

2012-04-18 Thread Martin Guy
On 17 April 2012 18:36, Wookey wrote: > debian armel is currently > built for v4t but is likely to move forward to v5 at some point. -1 as we have and others have products that are arm4vt and that ship with Debian as its standard system. How big is the speed advantage for v5 users when optimizing