Re: [armhf alpha hppa] manual experimental build request: dietlibc, then mksh

2011-11-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >please schedule manual builds of the following packages on >armhf alpha hppa buildds (or equivalent): > > dietlibc (0.33~cvs2008-1) experimental; urgency=low Please use 0.33~cvs2008-2 (just uploaded) instead, it should fix hppa. (Please build in a clean chroot, with sbuild or

Re: [Arm-netbook] 9nov11: progress on allwinner A10

2011-11-10 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Wookey wrote: > It is certainly true that just connecting NAND direct to the CPU > _will_ be really slow because you have to do all the ECC calcs > everytime you read or write enything in software. That's painfully > slow. You need something that does the ECC for

Re: [Arm-netbook] 9nov11: progress on allwinner A10

2011-11-10 Thread Wookey
+++ Gordan Bobic [2011-11-09 21:52 +]: > On 09/11/2011 21:32, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > >>I'm not sure what the point is of having internal flash if you have a SD/uSD > >>slot AND a SATA port. Dropping internal NAND alltogether seems like an > >>obvious choice. Depends what you