On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Phil Endecott
wrote:
> Hi Luke,
wotcha mr endecott
> This sort of question should always be considered in the context of the lead
> time, i.e. "in 9 months time when TI and NVidia and Freescale (etc.) have
> announced their next generation chips and boards, woul
Hi Luke,
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl.net> writes:
> question (for everyone): if there existed a board which used a
> single-core 800mhz Cortex A9, maximum hard limit of 512mb RAM, but
> also had SATA-II and 10/100 Ethernet, would it be of interest, and how
> much would you pay for it? sim
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-15
Severity: normal
Hello,
The test suite of ocaml-extunix 0.0.3-1 fails on armel because the
following program:
#include
int main() {
void *buffer[100];
return backtrace(buffer, 100);
}
returns 0. It returns with a non-zero status (3 everywhere I've
Hello,
2011/8/10 Benjamin Cama :
>> >> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok.
>>
>> > Sure. Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you
>> > file a bug.
Patch applied on version control system. Thanks.
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. -
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:42:33PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> ok... yes, i can ask.
>
> question (for everyone): if there existed a board which used a
> single-core 800mhz Cortex A9, maximum hard limit of 512mb RAM, but
> also had SATA-II and 10/100 Ethernet, would it be of int
Hi Hector,
Le mercredi 10 août 2011 à 16:27 +0100, Hector Oron a écrit :
> 2011/8/10 Martin Michlmayr :
> > * Benjamin Cama [2011-08-04 18:20]:
>
> >> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok.
>
> > Sure. Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you
> > file a bug.
Gordan Bobic wrote:
[...]
> The overheating is muchly exaggerated. The white ones - same CPU/ARM,
> but no eSATA plumbed in (you can solder it on, though), have no fan in
> them. I have one, and it's regularly used for a few days' worth of
> compiling jobs at a time, and yes, it gets quite warm, bu
Hi,
2011/8/10 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Benjamin Cama [2011-08-04 18:20]:
>> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok.
> Sure. Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you
> file a bug.
Sure, but I'll need Benjamin to test it, as I do not own such device.
Cheers,
--
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:46:11 +0200, Arnaud Patard (Rtp)
wrote:
Gordan Bobic writes:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:42:33 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David Given wrote:
Are there any decent-looking Cortex A9 boards out or upcoming
which
support ethe
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:39:19 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Gordan Bobic
wrote:
question (for everyone): if there existed a board which used a
single-core 800mhz Cortex A9, maximum hard limit of 512mb RAM, but
also had SATA-II and 10/100 Ethernet
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>> question (for everyone): if there existed a board which used a
>> single-core 800mhz Cortex A9, maximum hard limit of 512mb RAM, but
>> also had SATA-II and 10/100 Ethernet, would it be of interest, and
>> how
>> much would you pay for it?
Gordan Bobic writes:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:42:33 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David Given wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any decent-looking Cortex A9 boards out or upcoming which
>>> support ethernet and SATA? So far I've found:
>>>
>>> PandaBoard
* Benjamin Cama [2011-08-04 18:20]:
> -path=$(mount | grep ext[23] | sed -n '/sda1/ {s/\/dev\/sda1 on \(.*\)
> type.*/\1/; p}')
> +path=$(mount | grep ext[23] | sed -n '/sda1\|md0/ {s/\/dev\/\(sda1\|md0\) on
> \(.*\) type.*/\2/; p}')
> if [ -z "$path" ]; then
> echo "You have to create an
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:42:33 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David Given wrote:
Are there any decent-looking Cortex A9 boards out or upcoming which
support ethernet and SATA? So far I've found:
PandaBoard --- $180, ethernet, no SATA.
Samsung Origen
Trimslice just started a opensource developer program. They'll give you a unit
for 175usd plus shipping.
--
~Jeff Hoogland
http://JeffHoogland.com
On Wed Aug 10 2011 07:42:33 AM CDT, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David Given wrote:
>
> > Are there any
On 09/08/11 16:46, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> single-lane PCI-e is still only gigabit
>
AFAIK, single-lane "1st generation" PCIe is 2.5 gigabit, and "2nd
generation" is 5 gigabit. Also significant is the max-payload-size
capabilities of either end of the link (lspci -vv). A lot o
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:35 PM, David Given wrote:
> Are there any decent-looking Cortex A9 boards out or upcoming which
> support ethernet and SATA? So far I've found:
>
> PandaBoard --- $180, ethernet, no SATA.
>
> Samsung Origen --- $250, no ethernet, no SATA.
>
> Igloo Snowball --- $209, ethe
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Tim Small wrote:
> On 09/08/11 16:46, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> single-lane PCI-e is still only gigabit
>>
>
>
> AFAIK, single-lane "1st generation" PCIe is 2.5 gigabit, and "2nd
> generation" is 5 gigabit. Also significant is the max-payload-size
>
On Aug 9, 2011, at 16:21, Phil Endecott wrote:
> Jeremiah Foster jeremiahfoster.com> writes:
>> Sure. Here's a link: http://jeremiahfoster.com/trimslice/
>
> Right, so that's a half-size SATA SSD (JEDEC MO-297). Nice that they're
> using a
> standard form-factor with a connector. Would a ful
On 09.08.2011 17:46, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> single-lane PCI-e is still only gigabit, phil, and SATA-II is 3.0
> gb/s. so it still really doesn't cut the mustard. you'd need a 4x
> PCI-e to meet the SATA-II specification
There are many PCIe SATA controllers with x1 slot - Sil3132
20 matches
Mail list logo