On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 03:23:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:10:11PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > For ARM, we can achieve the goal by augmenting the default kernel command-
> > line options: either
>
> > alignment=3
> > Fix up each alingment fault, b
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:48:16AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Friday 17 June 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 17 June 2011 14:10:11 Dave Martin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > As part of the
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:17:59PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>
> > Dave Martin writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've recently become aware that a few packages are causing alignment
> > > faults on ARM, and are relying on the alignment fi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:53:21PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > >> There is still going to be a small cost even in hardware fixup so this
> > >> is very much worth solving despite it's "becoming invisible" because the
> > >> chips are hiding / solving it already.
> > >
> > > But I believe that h/w
On 18 June 2011 22:17, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Turns out that a prominent ARM developer still has binaries from the
> ARMv3 era around, and the default of not fixing up misaligned user space
> accesses is for remaining compatible with them.
> So if you do have a version of glibc that is not from 1
5 matches
Mail list logo
