Re: Finalizing Intel NAS SS4000-E installation

2010-12-21 Thread JF Straeten
Re, On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 09:17:39PM +0100, H wrote: [...] > Enter script, terminate with empty line > >> fis load ramdisk.gz > >> fis load zImage > >> exec -c "console=ttyS0,115200 rw root=/dev/ram mem=2...@0xa000" -r > >> 0x0180 > >> [...] > So it works great :) I no longer have

Re: ARMv4-support in armel/squeeze?

2010-12-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Loïc Minier (l...@dooz.org) [101221 21:14]: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > > If it breaks, then yes. But what if the rdeps work, but perhaps with > > limited functionality for the user interface only? (Which means that > > any packages build-depending on it won't have any limitati

Re: Finalizing Intel NAS SS4000-E installation

2010-12-21 Thread H
H wrote on 20101219: > H wrote on 20101217: > ... > > EM-7210 ver.T04 2005-12-12 (For ver.AA) > > == Executing boot script in 1.000 seconds - enter ^C to abort > > RedBoot> fis load ramdisk.gz > > RedBoot> fis load zImage > > RedBoot> exec > > Using base address 0x01008000 and length 0x0020 > >

Re: ARMv4-support in armel/squeeze?

2010-12-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > If it breaks, then yes. But what if the rdeps work, but perhaps with > limited functionality for the user interface only? (Which means that > any packages build-depending on it won't have any limitation.) > > I think it would be ok to accept such limita

Re: ARMv4-support in armel/squeeze?

2010-12-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Loïc Minier (l...@dooz.org) [101221 10:51]: > If libfoo is built with different flags in the first stage and that > breaks any rdeps (or rbdeps), then the first stage should provide a > different package name e.g. libfoo-stage1, or libfoo-noreadline and > relevant rdeps/rbdeps should be adapt

Re: ARMv4-support in armel/squeeze?

2010-12-21 Thread Loïc Minier
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010, Andreas Barth wrote: > The question is also if we accept all these limitations as sane for > bootstraping: > 1. some binary packages might be not built > 2. documentation might be missing > 3. user interface might restricted (e.g. a package might be compiled > without readline

Re: ARMv4-support in armel/squeeze?

2010-12-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Wookey (woo...@wookware.org) [101221 00:43]: > Using a virtual architecture of 'bootstrap' to annotate the build-deps > is neat. It deals with the issue of repeating the build-deps in > Buildd-depends-StageN as sugested in the URLs below. However it does > limit you to only one 'build stage'. i.e