hi,
Am Freitag, den 08.10.2010, 21:24 +0100 schrieb Phil Endecott:
> I hope there are others out there interested in this machine, the first
> of its kind.
...
great to see that there is debian interest, as one of the devs who work
on the image, i'd like to point you guys to some missing points .
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Maciej Grela wrote:
>> 2010/10/18 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton :
>>> i have received the Toshiba AC100 GPL kernel sources, kindly supplied
>>> by toshiba digital media
>>> group, by CD. i hav
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:08 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> Another approach would be to use a u-boot environment variable to save
> and restore the (approximate) time. The advantage is that it could be
> done before fscking any filesystems, at the cost of some additional
> wear on the flash.
> No ma
Hallo
Martin, thanks for your effort. Just a question: Have the patched been
updated from intel side?
I'm asking because yesterday -- coincidential on the same day as
Nathan ;-) -- I played with my Thecus and the DMA enabled kernel on your
repository. Along the kernel, I also install the linux-li
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010, peter green wrote:
> Many arm systems don't have a rtc. This means every time they reboot
> the clock goes back to the epoch. Clocks going back to the epoch
> causes all sorts of issues (some versions of fsck fail, make won't
> work properly, logs will be impossible to relate
Another approach would be to use a u-boot environment variable to save
and restore the (approximate) time. The advantage is that it could be
done before fscking any filesystems, at the cost of some additional
wear on the flash.
No matter where you store the time, when restoring it you could also
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 08:04:31AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Many arm systems don't have a rtc. This means every time they reboot the
> clock goes back to the epoch. Clocks going back to the epoch causes all
> sorts of issues (some versions of fsck fail, make won't work properly,
> logs wil
Hi !
Last year i tried a backported kernel which gave me nice results on
N2100. I remember I got around ~6 MB during read and write over Network
on NFS file share, but with processor load ~95%.
http://packages.debian.org/lenny-backports/linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-iop32x
If you really like a fast
* Markus Kreiner [2010-10-21 19:47]:
> > To begin with, can you show us your /etc/apt/sources.list
> deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free
...
I'll take this off line so we don't spam the list.
--
M
> To begin with, can you show us your /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates m
* Markus Kreiner [2010-10-21 17:17]:
> so it seems i don't get that, and haven't had before. could someone
> be of assistance for a noob like me?
It works for me.
To begin with, can you show us your /etc/apt/sources.list
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> repository was out of date. I've updated it now. If you run:
>
> apt-get update
> apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> You'll get 2.6.26-25lenny1dma1.
so it seems i don't get that, and haven't had before. could someone be
of assistance for a noob like me?
if followed this http://www.cyrius.com/debi
* Markus Kreiner [2010-10-21 01:37]:
> i *think* i also got the kernel with the DMA-patches, but am too much
> a linux novice to tell for sure, uname -a says:
> Linux debian 2.6.26-2-iop32x #1 Thu Sep 16 18:42:37 UTC 2010 armv5tel
> GNU/Linux
I was on holidays when 2.6.26-25lenny1 was released s
> The DMA kernels are out of date. I'm updating them right now.
cool, thanks, but i doubt this helps in my case - as haven't got that
bad a performance on the box itself, but really poor one over any
network-connection (tried samba and ftp so far).
any other ideas?
thanks,
markus.
--
To UNSUB
* Nathan [2010-10-21 20:20]:
> > Linux debian 2.6.26-2-iop32x #1 Thu Sep 16 18:42:37 UTC 2010 armv5tel
> > GNU/Linux
>
> I downloaded the .deb files from Martin's repository and installed them
> that way. On my 2100, uname gives the following output:
>
> Linux debian 2.6.26-2-iop32x #1 Sat Jun
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:37:07 +0200, Markus Kreiner
wrote:
> i *think* i also got the kernel with the DMA-patches, but am too much
> a linux novice to tell for sure, uname -a says:
> Linux debian 2.6.26-2-iop32x #1 Thu Sep 16 18:42:37 UTC 2010 armv5tel
> GNU/Linux
I downloaded the .deb files from
Many arm systems don't have a rtc. This means every time they reboot the
clock goes back to the epoch. Clocks going back to the epoch causes all
sorts of issues (some versions of fsck fail, make won't work properly,
logs will be impossible to relate to each other, and very annoying
forced passw
17 matches
Mail list logo
