Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> sadly the recommended tool (ikconfig script?) didn't work, i couldn't
> tell you why.
That's easy. It relies on the config option CONFIG_IKCONFIG being enabled,
which it isn't. If it was enabled, we wouldn't even need the script as we
could simply copy it fr
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>> Namely, if there was ALWAYS a way (which could not be turned off) to
>> extract a kernel's configuration (in a format which could be plunked into
>> /usr/src/linux and used to build new modules) from the running kernel,
>> things would be much
> Namely, if there was ALWAYS a way (which could not be turned off) to
> extract a kernel's configuration (in a format which could be plunked into
> /usr/src/linux and used to build new modules) from the running kernel,
> things would be much simpler.
The config is generally fairly easy to figu
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2010-03-01 14:19 +]:
> Not quite sure what you are trying to say there, but emdebian-squeeze
> is Debian using busybox instead of gnu coreutils, and with dependency
> changes to make for smaller packages and thus
+++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2010-03-01 14:19 +]:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Wookey wrote:
> > +++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2010-02-26 23:34 +]:
> >> ok, i have successfully installed debian/lenny with various things
> >> removed such as a ton of locale files and /usr/sha
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:48, JLB wrote:
> Namely, if there was ALWAYS a way (which could not be turned off) to extract
> a kernel's configuration (in a format which could be plunked into
> /usr/src/linux and used to build new modules) from the running kernel,
> things would be much simpler.
>
> W
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:48:55AM -0500, JLB wrote:
> I have a suggestion. The best solution to the 'devices shipped with
> hard/impossible-to-change binary kernels' problem, as far as I can tell,
> would have to come not from the Debian team, but from the upstream kernel
> team.
>
> Namely,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Hector Oron wrote:
Hello,
Nowadays, the number of devices (non x86) is growing and growing.
Lots of these devices have not upstream linux kernel support, which
makes it a bit harder to maintain in the context of debian-installer.
Also, afaict, debian-installer team does not
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Benjamin Henrion wrote:
> Do you know where I can buy such device?
cc'd to adam gill, he's the person with direct contact with the factory.
[ the rest of this message is informational, for your benefit, ben,
and also for anyone else who'd like one, too, so you k
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Hector Oron wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> hi hector, this is a timely message / issue to raise: it's very
> relevant for the (newly discovered) CT-PC89E arm netbook which a
> friend of mine found.
>
>>
(Dropped private CCs)
On Monday 01 March 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> * the binary-only kernel we're working with, they haven't even
> bothered to put in ext2,3 or 4
ext4 is enabled.
From dmesg:
EXT4-fs warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended
EXT4 FS on mmcblk0p3
11 matches
Mail list logo
