I then installed an internal 2.5" hard drive inside the enclosure of
the Open-Rd and tried to install debian on it using the same
procedure.
I think the 2.5" HDD had an EFI partition to start with.
If the GPT table was already there then afaict that would explain why you ended
up with GPT at the
Colin Tuckley (22/01/2010):
> Your list of buildd machines is seriously out of date if you are
> talking about armel.
You do realize you're answering to a mail dated “08 May 2007”, right?
> --
> Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1223 293413 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id
> Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 1433
Argh! Ignore that - I was replying to an ancient message by mistake.
Colin
--
Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1223 293413 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id
Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE
I'm not as dumb as you look.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The problems mainly comes from the build daemons. Only *3 out of 7* are
> building packages, and one of the three is also building stable-security
> from time to time.
Are you talking about the deprecated "arm" arch or the current "armel" arch?
Your list of buildd machine
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 01/19/2010 09:18 PM, peter green wrote:
A while back fsck got more bitchy (treated as an error rather than a
warning) about timestamps in the future, I filed a bug report about this
change in behaviour that breaks but the
this seems to have been cut off --
clone 566256 -1
reassign -1 566256
severity -1 serious
tags 566256 + wontfix
thanks
On 22.01.2010 14:56, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Package: g++-4.4
Version: 4.4.2-9
Severity: important
std::va_list has been mangled in the 4.4 release, so some more packages FTBFS
now on armel e.g. with:
/build/buil
6 matches
Mail list logo
