On 11/24/2009 05:36 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Can you report this to lkml?
i just posted the report with the console to the lkml (first ever post
to lkml, that sound you hear is my teeth chattering in fear). hopefully
it is of some use to the kernel development process.
Regards,
--d
On Nov 24, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:41:31PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:02:02PM -0400, Mark J. Small wrote:
My kernel is linux-image-2.6.30-2-kirkwood_2.6.30-8+orion1_armel.deb
from http://people.debian.org/~tb
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:41:31PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 06:02:02PM -0400, Mark J. Small wrote:
>>My kernel is linux-image-2.6.30-2-kirkwood_2.6.30-8+orion1_armel.deb
>>from http://people.debian.org/~tbm/orion/. I'll happily supply any
>>other info that would help
* Mark J. Small [2009-11-24 18:02]:
> My kernel is linux-image-2.6.30-2-kirkwood_2.6.30-8+orion1_armel.deb from
> http://people.debian.org/~tbm/orion/. I'll happily supply any other info
> that
> would help track this down. Please help me get reliable XFS on this armel box.
I'm sorry but XFS
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor [2009-11-24 15:05]:
> urgh, i take that back. During an I/O-heavy operation (mpd rebuilding
> its index to a filesystem stored on a 2GB USB flash drive), the machine
> became unresponsive. i'm hooked into the serial console, and i see
> messages about blocked tasks for more
As has been reported before, Debian on an NSLU2 using raid might not
boot without adding a rootdelay (or was it delayroot) parameter to
the kernel.
That has solved the problem for me previously. But that was on a
NSLU2 with a serial cable. How can I add the parameter on an NSLU2
without serial a
Hi there,
I've got debian lenny running on a QNAP TS-219P (Marvell Kirkwood/armel), and
I'm trying to set up a nice big disk for storing my Mythtv files.
I've got a 1 TB disk, with roughly 900 GB set aside for an XFS partition to
store some recordings. I can create the filesystem with no prob
On 11/24/2009 12:29 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 11/20/2009 06:27 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> I've built kernel snapshots for armel based on 2.6.32-rc8. If your
>> device has a recovery mechanism or a serial console, feel free to test
>> them on your favourite ARM machine and report any
* Karsten König [2009-11-23 19:50]:
> Well now I want to use it finally, how do I see if it actually
> works? mkfs.ext3 is much faster on the unencrypted partition, on
> the encrypted partition now mv_crypto is up to ~40% cpu usage, so I
> guess it is running but still very slow, or am I mistaken
Martin Michlmayr wrote on 24.11.2009 12:32:
> flash-kernel expects the kernel to end in -kirkwood. Rename
> 2.6.32-rc8 to 2.6.32-rc8-kirkwood and it should work.
thanks, the new kernel is running right now.
Unfortunately there seems to be a problem with the patched ethernet
module. I patched mv64
* David Fröhlich [2009-11-24 12:21]:
> So far everything seems fine. But I am unable to flash the new kernel.
>
> nas:/usr/src/linux-2.6.32-rc8# flash-kernel 2.6.32-rc8
> Kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-rc8 does not match your subarchitecture
> kirkwood, therefore not writing it to flash.
flash-kern
Lennert Buytenhek wrote on 23.11.2009 15:50:
> The general idea here would be to do this in mv643xx_eth.c:
> [...]
> Can you try that?
Kernel compiling finally finished.
I downloaded the latest v2.6.32rc8 directly from kernel.org and applied
the config used in this binary package:
http://people.de
12 matches
Mail list logo