Sorry, based in the states. I love mine. Going to order a few more next
paycheck. Definitely worth the cost. Read about people working with it at:
http://plugcomputer.org
--
Steve
Equal bytes for women.
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Rafal Czlonka wrote:
Hi All,
It's a little bit off-topic but I'm th
Hi all,
After more than a month, I finally got the desired toy. :-)
Cheers
--
Héctor Orón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi All,
It's a little bit off-topic but I'm thinking about getting one myself so
if anyone from Cambridge (UK) area is thinking of getting one we could
split the shipping cost.
Cheers,
--
Raf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On 4/23/09, Drew Parsons wrote:
> effectively what we have on armel is the situation where FPU_SETCW is
> NOT in fact available, so fpu_control.h should not be defining it.
Thanks. I've submitted a bug report against glibc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 16:08 +0100, Martin Guy wrote:
> On 4/19/09, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > is in FPU_SETCW, so it's certainly related to Debian patch
> > fpucontrol-bug350595.patch.
>
> Maybe
Related in the sense that this patch will be the right place for the
fix/workaround.
> #if defined(_
5 matches
Mail list logo