Re: using kernels bigger than 1966080 bytes on the nslug with slugimage

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:10:43AM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > > i have a weird problem trying to build a d-i-nslu2.bin image with > slugimage that is supposed to carry a kernel binary of a size of 1978300 > bytes ... > > as i understand by looking at the d-i code that generates di-nslu2

using kernels bigger than 1966080 bytes on the nslug with slugimage

hi, i have a weird problem trying to build a d-i-nslu2.bin image with slugimage that is supposed to carry a kernel binary of a size of 1978300 bytes ... as i understand by looking at the d-i code that generates di-nslu2.bin there are 49 blocks of 131072 bytes each available for the kernel and ini

RE: Version of ARM core version and Linux kernel foriceweasel_3.0.5-1_armel.deb?

Thanks a lot! Yes, it was from lenny. -Original Message- From: Loïc Minier [mailto:l...@dooz.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 5:59 AM To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Version of ARM core version and Linux kernel foriceweasel_3.0.5-1_armel.deb? On Mon, Feb 09, 2009, Wei

Re: Version of ARM core version and Linux kernel for iceweasel_3.0.5-1_armel.deb?

On Mon, Feb 09, 2009, Weidong Li wrote: > 1.Which ARM core version (ARMv5, v6 or v7) was it built for? > 2.Which Linux kernel version (2.4 or 2.6) was it built for? > 3.Which ARM additional hard features does it expect, e.g., VFP, > WMMX, endianess, etc.? That's not specific to this