Re: versatile architecture image suitable for qemu usage?

2009-01-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, At Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:44:33 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > I tried to test qemubuilder armel support and realized that I don't > > have the latest kernel. > > > > initrd isn't distributed inside a package, and I don't think there's a > > kernel

Re: versatile architecture image suitable for qemu usage?

2009-01-09 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > The debootstrap option does unfortunately not work with plain Debian. > There are bugs and patches available though. Perhaps it's worth > polishing and pushing them. > > A third option would be to use the classical two stage debootstrap > process with --foreign and --second-stage. But this

Re: versatile architecture image suitable for qemu usage?

2009-01-09 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 11:35:22PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > I tried to test qemubuilder armel support and realized that I don't > have the latest kernel. > > initrd isn't distributed inside a package, and I don't think there's a > kernel which doesn't work without a initrd.

Re: versatile architecture image suitable for qemu usage?

2009-01-09 Thread Loïc Minier
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I tried to test qemubuilder armel support and realized that I don't > have the latest kernel. > > initrd isn't distributed inside a package, and I don't think there's a > kernel which doesn't work without a initrd. > > Is there a kernel which contain