Re: Please test debian-installer rc1 images

2008-11-14 Thread Marc Singer
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:01:42PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-13 09:37]: > > Could we build only a package with the source in the main kernel and > > have binary packages generated by other source packages > > build-depending on the source? This wou

Re: Please test debian-installer rc1 images

2008-11-14 Thread Robert Nelson
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yuck, I don't really like this idea. > > Let's hope Marvell's fast development board will help... > -- Just a random question, but what is the average build time for a generic kernel package for the current debian arm

Re: Please test debian-installer rc1 images

2008-11-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-13 09:37]: > Could we build only a package with the source in the main kernel and > have binary packages generated by other source packages > build-depending on the source? This would allow building multiple > arm flavours in parallel and we wouldn't have

Re: beagleboard kernel for debian

2008-11-14 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 04:43:20PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > I believe Current status is that basic OMAP3 and some OMAP2 support > is in mainline kernel now. The biggest bit missing ATM is the > TWL4030 driver. And then the big stream of power managment stuff > that is still WiP... TWL4030 seem