* Michael Glockenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-30 14:32]:
> Because I got no answer from Theodore too, I ask me now what happens
> when lenny is released as stable, do we have to live with this problem
> until the next stable debian version? Or does the armel platform does
> not follow the har
Hi Jonas
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 18:34, Jonas Häggqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gordon Farquharson wrote:
>
>> For some reason, the ixp4xx_eth module isn't being loaded. I'm not
>> sure why 2.6.25-7 isn't loading the module on your system, but I don't
>> think that it is worth investigating
Hi Jonas
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 16:17, Jonas Häggqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a reboot of my NSLU2, the network interface fails to appear. By
> looking at /var/log/dmesg*, I notice the following two lines in older
> logs, which are not there in the latest:
>
> [ 34.57] eth0: MII
After a reboot of my NSLU2, the network interface fails to appear. By
looking at /var/log/dmesg*, I notice the following two lines in older
logs, which are not there in the latest:
[ 34.57] eth0: MII PHY 1 on NPE-B
[ 61.53] NPE-B: firmware functionality 0x0, revision 0x2:1
I expect th
Hi guys,
I'm afraid that I've got some potentially nooby questions and I
apologise if they've been asked before, but I've been unable to find the
answers myself and I'm somewhat new to running linux on embedded
systems, and I feel that I've reached my current level of mad skillz...
Would I b
I've got a small number of KAMIO-2701 development boards manufactured by
IEI, these are based on a PXA270. I'm hoping to be able to reserve at
least one to help out a couple of deserving open-source compiler projects.
Unfortunately, these boards arrived with Windows CE. The manufacturer
doesn'
Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:04:18AM -0500, John Griessen wrote:
and one silicon chip
from luminary has precision time protocol another great reason.
You are expecting to fit debian in 256KB of flash? because that's what
the luminary cortex-m3 chips have... also the 64K of
Catalin Marinas wrote:
I did the Cortex-M3 Linux port and from my experience you need about
4MB of RAM to be able to run a few commands (I used busybox as a
filesystem). With 2MB, you can't even start more than about 4 simple
commands (like "ls") in parallel
So, if low power is one of my goals,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:04:18AM -0500, John Griessen wrote:
> I am just wondering if any kind of debian subset even can be put on a
> machine without MMU? I'm not just interested in these for cost alone,
> but for low power networking in remote places -- sensor networks,
> so the cortex-m3 A
John Griessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am just wondering if any kind of debian subset even can be put on a
> machine without MMU?
Not that easy, you would need to change the C library to uClibc since
AFAIK glibc doesn't support noMMU systems.
> Since linux-arm has a cortex-m3 linux port (us
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:32:13PM +0200, Michael Glockenstein wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr schrieb am Freitag, 26. September 2008 14:08:
> > * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-10 09:06]:
> > > I unpacked this on an armel system and can confirm that the filesystem
> > > is totally messed
Awhile back I see in the archives:
From: Riku Voipio :
Now to expand our userbase, the easiest way would be to replace the
versatile kernel with something else qemu supports. We want kernels
that:
1) That the hardware is actually suitable for Debian - Enough storage
space an
Marc Pignat wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Is there any plan to support this machine?
>
> Or even if it isn't supported, where can I find a howto for testing debian on
> it?
Check back in the archives a few weeks, you'll see some traffic from me and
others regarding how I got my n4100 working.
Short answ
Hi all!
Is there any plan to support this machine?
Or even if it isn't supported, where can I find a howto for testing debian on
it?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Marc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Michlmayr schrieb am Freitag, 26. September 2008 14:08:
> * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-10 09:06]:
> > I unpacked this on an armel system and can confirm that the filesystem
> > is totally messed up. Mounting it as ext2 works.
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> I realize you've probably be
somehow overcome framebuffer problem by adding few lines in my
/etc/X11/xorg.conf file ...
Section "Device"
Identifier "Framebuffer"
Driver "fbdev"
Option "fbdev" "/dev/fb0"
EndSection
and in the monitor secion i have included
Mode "800x600"
D
16 matches
Mail list logo
