* Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 16:36]:
> I've tried to create a reproduction case. The following filesystem
> image needs to be unpacked onto a 6 gigabyte (or larger) partition,
> after uncompressing it via bunzip2. (i.e., via "bunzip2 <
> testbig.e2i.bz2 | dd of=/dev/sdXX bs=4k")
HTML clipboard
*Hello,
*
* Short cut to success:
http://website.ws/phpbw*
*My name is Paulo and I've got to tell you about the HOTTEST new home
business opportunity that is blazing across the net like wildfire. EVERYONE
is joining this one... and for good reason!
*
*Every single day a H
It may be easier to save your data and reinstall from scratch. In any
case you should save that info in case something goes wrong during the
conversion procedure. Let us know how you get on
I ended up as you suggested re-installing to armel with the lenny-beta
installer. Fortunatly the SLUG onl
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:20:47AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > * Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 14:30]:
> >> So now the kernel is very happy talking to the drives, apparently. But it
> >> doesn't like the e1000's:
> > I thought you were aware of this, bu
On 9/4/08, Mikael Rudberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried searching the net for the easiest way of upgrading to my
> etch-nslu2 to armel-lenny. Is it possible to do a dist-upgrade or is the
> migration method in the debian wiki
> (http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiHowto) the only method
> avai
Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Bill" == Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Bill> ... and this patch is so bad, I hesitate to post it. But
> Bill> if I don't, I'll lose it myself! :)
>
> ;)
>
> Bill> +#else
> Bill> +#warning "TODO: Figure out how to deal with EEPROM c
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 14:30]:
>> So now the kernel is very happy talking to the drives, apparently. But it
>> doesn't like the e1000's:
>
> I thought you were aware of this, but in case you're not: Thecus
> removed the EEPROM from both i82541 chi
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:48:49PM +0300, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Pietro Abate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-09 12:45]:
> > I'm testing the installer on my qnap t209. I get a kernel ops.
> > Here I'm using raid1 + lvm + ext3 nothing too fancy
> Can you reproduce this oops - i.e. did you get
* Pietro Abate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-09 12:45]:
> I'm testing the installer on my qnap t209. I get a kernel ops.
> Here I'm using raid1 + lvm + ext3 nothing too fancy
Can you reproduce this oops - i.e. did you get it more than once?
Do you do anything special when this happens?
--
Mart
Hi all,
I'm testing the installer on my qnap t209. I get a kernel ops.
Here I'm using raid1 + lvm + ext3 nothing too fancy
~ # uname -a
Linux qnap 2.6.26-1-orion5x #1 Fri Aug 29 10:31:24 UTC 2008 armv5tel unknown
:(
p
[42952301.70] [ cut here ]
[42952301.70] W
> "Bill" == Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Bill> ... and this patch is so bad, I hesitate to post it. But
Bill> if I don't, I'll lose it myself! :)
;)
Bill> +#else
Bill> +#warning "TODO: Figure out how to deal with EEPROM checksum on N4100"
Bill> + static int
* Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-08 14:30]:
> So now the kernel is very happy talking to the drives, apparently. But it
> doesn't like the e1000's:
I thought you were aware of this, but in case you're not: Thecus
removed the EEPROM from both i82541 chips and stored the MAC address
in t
Am Montag, 8. September 2008 22:36:59 schrieben Sie:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 07:29:42PM +0300, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> > Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > >> and a patch here:
> > >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2008-August/msg00011.html
> > >
> > > I built 2.6.26 images with this patch if
13 matches
Mail list logo
