Simon Voortman wrote:
I did a fresh install with the latest release from
http://www.slug-firmware.net/ because it says:
Latest release
Debian/NSLU2 Experimental 5.0beta1 (Unreleased Beta)
Old releases
These releases are obsolete and no longer supported. Please use the
latest release.
How does "solder onto the RedBoot UART" count as a "remote exploit"? ;)
-Original Message-
From: "Michael Goetze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Sent: 4/29/08 3:42 PM
Subject: Thecus N299
Hi,
aparently Thecus has released a new, incredibly cheap, 2-Bay NAS, the
N2
Hi,
aparently Thecus has released a new, incredibly cheap, 2-Bay NAS, the
N299. It seems to run on the Gemini SL3516[1] which seems to have all
the necessary code already available under the GPL [2]. Now, since
I'm a cheapo, and the N2100 costs twice as much, I'm quite
interested. I wonde
Martin Michlmayr schreef:
Kevin Price reported that the new initramfs-tools in testing (version
0.92) generates a ramdisk that does not boot correctly on the NSLU2 -
it makes your system unbootable (see bug #478236). Note that this
bug only affects users of testing - users of Debian 4.0 are not
Kevin Price reported that the new initramfs-tools in testing (version
0.92) generates a ramdisk that does not boot correctly on the NSLU2 -
it makes your system unbootable (see bug #478236). Note that this
bug only affects users of testing - users of Debian 4.0 are not
affected.
If you run Debian
I can confirm this bug. Do not upgrade your nslu2 in case you're
running testing (lenny) rather than stable (etch)!
The initramfs-tools maintainer will upload a fixed package later
today.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
* Stuart Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-27 23:23]:
> Reading package lists... Error!
> E: Malformed 3rd word in the Status line
> E: Error occurred while processing initramfs-tools (UsePackage2)
> E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/dpkg/status
> E: The package lists or status file could not be p
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Kevin Price wrote:
> maximilian attems schrieb:
> > is it reproducible?
>
> Yes. I updated a bunch of packages, making the slug unbootable. Then I
> flashed the backup. After a normal boot, I installed initramfs-tools
> 0.91e, flashed again, which made it boot OK. Then I upda
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-29 14:56]:
Odd, they definitely sped up things here (on N2100).
Could you send me your .config for N2100?
I've attached a config file, but basically, you just need to enable
the DMA engine and the options that the pat
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-29 14:56]:
>> Odd, they definitely sped up things here (on N2100).
> Could you send me your .config for N2100?
I've attached a config file, but basically, you just need to enable
the DMA engine and the options that the patches add.
--
Martin Mich
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-29 14:36]:
Last time I tried those patches on N4100, which should be similar,
(2.6.23-iop series, and every earlier release) disk performance was
still very poor.
Odd, they definitely sped up things here (on N2100).
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-29 14:36]:
> Last time I tried those patches on N4100, which should be similar,
> (2.6.23-iop series, and every earlier release) disk performance was
> still very poor.
Odd, they definitely sped up things here (on N2100).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http
Martin Michlmayr schrieb:
* Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-24 13:23]:
Are these patches the same as those on
http://sf.net/projects/xscaleiop or is it something different?
Yeah, the patches are in there. Also look for Dan William's mail to
linux-arm-kernel a few weeks ago whe
13 matches
Mail list logo
